linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: Accelerate "pick_next_entity" under special condition
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:42:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F222B2B.6010602@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F21FC69.6040402@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 01/27/2012 09:22 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
> Hi, Ingo
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I have try use "ls -l" to see the size of sched.o, but after applied the
> patch, it is still 1636.
>
> I have not use this method before, may be I use the wrong command...
>
> But I think the new code should be similar to the old one after compile,
> because we still have 3 condition check here.
>
> I suppose the new sched.o will be a little bigger, because one jump
> command and a label need to be added.
>

Try to see if `size` helps.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-27  4:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-16  9:37 [PATCH] sched: Accelerate "pick_next_entity" under special condition Michael Wang
2012-01-16  9:50 ` Michael Wang
2012-01-16  9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-16 10:34   ` Michael Wang
2012-01-17  2:36   ` [PATCH v2] " Michael Wang
2012-01-17  2:41     ` Michael Wang
2012-01-17  2:58     ` Xiaotian Feng
2012-01-17  3:04       ` Michael Wang
2012-01-25 15:55         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-26 10:04           ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-27  1:22             ` Michael Wang
2012-01-27  4:42               ` Cong Wang [this message]
2012-01-29  6:32                 ` Michael Wang
2012-01-29 16:33                   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-01-30  3:18                     ` Michael Wang
2012-01-30  3:25                       ` Cong Wang
2012-01-30  5:47                         ` Michael Wang
2012-07-03  6:34                           ` [PATCH] sched: remove useless code in yield_to Michael Wang
2012-07-12  5:45                             ` Michael Wang
2012-07-12 14:07                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-07-12 18:44                               ` Mike Galbraith
2012-07-16  2:39                               ` Michael Wang
2012-08-17  6:56                               ` Michael Wang
2012-08-17  9:43                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-10  3:05                             ` Michael Wang
2012-08-10  3:10                               ` Michael Wang
2012-08-10  5:52                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-09-04 18:50                             ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Remove useless code in yield_to() tip-bot for Michael Wang
2012-01-27  0:56           ` [PATCH v2] sched: Accelerate "pick_next_entity" under special condition Michael Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F222B2B.6010602@gmail.com \
    --to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=xtfeng@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).