From: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.com>
To: Dirk Gouders <gouders@et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Subject: Re: Slab corruption in floppy driver module
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:37:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F223F11.4050307@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <giobtq5e46.fsf@mx10.gouders.net>
On 01/27/2012 03:18 AM, Dirk Gouders wrote:
> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:05:32AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:04:20AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>>>> out_put_disk:
>>>> while (dr--) {
>>>> del_timer_sync(&motor_off_timer[dr]);
>>>> - if (disks[dr]->queue)
>>>> + if (disks[dr]->queue) {
>>>> blk_cleanup_queue(disks[dr]->queue);
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * The request queue reference we took at device
>>>> + * creation time has been put by above
>>>> + * blk_cleanup_queue(). We have not called add_disk()
>>>> + * yet and due to failure calling put_disk(). Put disk
>>>> + * will try to put a reference to disk->queue which is
>>>> + * taken in add_disk(). As we have not taken that
>>>> + * extra reference, putting extra reference down
>>>> + * will try to access already freed queue. Clear
>>>> + * disk->queue before calling put_disk().>
>>>> + */
>>>> + disks[dr]->queue = NULL;
>>>
>>> Yeah, this looks correct to me. It might be better to tone down the
>>> comment a bit tho. Wouldn't it be sufficient to say put_disk() isn't
>>> paired with add_disk() and will put one extra time?
>>
>> Sure. Toned down the comment as suggested. Here is the new patch.
>>
>> floppy: Cleanup disk->queue before caling put_disk() if add_disk() was never called
>>
>> add_disk() takes gendisk reference on request queue. If driver failed during
>> initialization and never called add_disk() then that extra reference is not
>> taken. That reference is put in put_disk(). floppy driver allocates the
>> disk, allocates queue, sets disk->queue and then relizes that floppy
>> controller is not present. It tries to tear down everything and tries to
>> put a reference down in put_disk() which was never taken.
>>
>> In such error cases cleanup disk->queue before calling put_disk() so that
>> we never try to put down a reference which was never taken in first place.
>>
>> Reported-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.com>
>> Tested-by: Dirk Gouders <gouders@et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/block/floppy.c | 8 +++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/block/floppy.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/block/floppy.c 2012-01-15 09:49:14.000000000 -0500
>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/block/floppy.c 2012-01-26 14:35:14.662374464 -0500
>> @@ -4368,8 +4368,14 @@ out_unreg_blkdev:
>> out_put_disk:
>> while (dr--) {
>> del_timer_sync(&motor_off_timer[dr]);
>> - if (disks[dr]->queue)
>> + if (disks[dr]->queue) {
>> blk_cleanup_queue(disks[dr]->queue);
>> + /*
>> + * put_disk() is not paired with add_disk() and
>> + * will put queue reference one extra time. fix it.
>> + */
>> + disks[dr]->queue = NULL;
>> + }
>> put_disk(disks[dr]);
>> }
>> return err;
>
>
> Probably a rare and uncommon one but it seems that the reloading case on
> a machine that has a floppy controller is a different problem. To be
> sure I tested the patch on a machine that has a floppy controller and
> when unloading and reloading the floppy module the log messages that I
> attached to a mail earlier in this thread are still generated.
>
Yeah, this seems like a different problem. Could you please try enabling
CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC and see whether is it pointing to the problem
code while loading/unloading the module?
Suresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-27 6:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-24 13:19 Slab corruption in floppy driver module Suresh Jayaraman
2012-01-24 22:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-25 7:59 ` Dirk Gouders
2012-01-25 9:04 ` Dirk Gouders
2012-01-26 15:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-26 18:05 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-26 18:53 ` Dirk Gouders
2012-01-26 19:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-26 21:48 ` Dirk Gouders
2012-01-26 21:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-27 6:07 ` Suresh Jayaraman [this message]
2012-01-27 11:30 ` Dirk Gouders
2012-01-27 19:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-28 10:53 ` Dirk Gouders
2012-01-29 19:36 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-30 6:03 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2012-01-27 6:03 ` Suresh Jayaraman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F223F11.4050307@suse.com \
--to=sjayaraman@suse.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gouders@et.bocholt.fh-gelsenkirchen.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).