public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
To: Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@citd.de>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Linux 3.2.5
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:28:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3118F7.8050205@ladisch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120207114806.GA15323@citd.de>

Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> On 07.02.2012 12:40, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>>> On 07.02.2012 11:19, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>>>> Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
>>>>> pci 0000:05:00.0: disabling ASPM on pre-1.1 PCIe device.  You can enable it with 'pcie_aspm=force'
>>>>
>>>> Please try that kernel parameter.
>>>
>>> I don't want/need ASPM, disabled is fine with me.
>>
>> In your case, it appears that sound requires ASPM.
>
> OK. I will try that later today.
>
> But i'm not hopeful because in syslog it says:
> ACPI FADT declares the system doesn't support PCIe ASPM, so disable it
> ...
> ACPI _OSC control for PCIe not granted, disabling ASPM
>
> So if ACPI doesn't want to relinquish control of ASPM, how is Linux
> supposed to enable it?

According to your logs, 3.2.4 didn't touch device 5:0, while 3.2.5 does
disable ASPM.  (Are there any other messages regarding 0000:05:00.0?)

It appears that this patch introduces new logic that forcibly disables
ASPM on pre-1.1 devices no matter what the BIOS says, although this
breaks your sound.

("Disable" can mean two things, tell the device to not do ASPM, or just
not tell the device anything.)


Regards,
Clemens

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-07 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-06 18:16 Linux 3.2.5 Greg KH
2012-02-06 18:16 ` Greg KH
2012-02-07  8:40 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2012-02-07 10:19   ` Clemens Ladisch
2012-02-07 10:58     ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2012-02-07 11:23       ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2012-02-07 11:40       ` Clemens Ladisch
2012-02-07 11:48         ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2012-02-07 12:28           ` Clemens Ladisch [this message]
2012-02-07 14:52             ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2012-02-07 18:29               ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2012-02-07 16:29             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-07 16:40               ` Matthew Garrett
2012-02-07 16:54               ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2012-02-07 16:59                 ` Matthew Garrett
2012-02-07 17:07                   ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2012-02-07 17:18                     ` Matthew Garrett
2012-02-28  0:13                   ` Greg KH
2012-02-28  0:19                     ` Matthew Garrett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F3118F7.8050205@ladisch.de \
    --to=clemens@ladisch.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ms@citd.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox