From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757383Ab2BIJYQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2012 04:24:16 -0500 Received: from mailout4.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.14]:30037 "EHLO mailout4.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751429Ab2BIJYK (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2012 04:24:10 -0500 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:24:32 +0100 From: Karol Lewandowski Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Exynos4: Bring exynos4-dt up to date In-reply-to: <1328028434-30139-2-git-send-email-k.lewandowsk@samsung.com> To: kgene.kim@samsung.com Cc: thomas.abraham@linaro.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com Message-id: <4F3390D0.7040209@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111109 Icedove/8.0 References: <1328028434-30139-1-git-send-email-k.lewandowsk@samsung.com> <1328028434-30139-2-git-send-email-k.lewandowsk@samsung.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 31.01.2012 17:47, Karol Lewandowski wrote: > This commit brings exynos4-dt in line with recent changes to > mach-exynos tree, specifically: > > - Fixes build break related to replacing plat/exynos4.h with common.h > in commit cc511b8d84d8 ("ARM: 7257/1: EXYNOS: introduce > arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.[ch]") > - Converts machine to use CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER as done for other > machines in commit 4e44d2cb95bd ("ARM: exynos4: convert to > CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER") converted all exynos boards but > exynos4-dt.c. Minor correction - text from "converted all.." shall be deleted, like: - Converts machine to use CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER as done for other machines in commit 4e44d2cb95bd ("ARM: exynos4: convert to CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER") (It's result of not proofreading it carefully enough after squashing all the patches.) I don't think such a change is worth sending patch again, but I would be grateful if you could fix it while merging. Thanks -- Karol Lewandowski | Samsung Poland R&D Center | Linux/Platform