linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus -v5
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:05:50 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3AD3B6.8070409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wr7pbwbz.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>

On 02/14/2012 02:55 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:57:45 -0800, Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat
>> <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> IOW, what output do you see from the following printk from
>>> arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c?
>>>
>>> printk(KERN_INFO "Total of %d processors activated (%lu.%02lu BogoMIPS).\n",
>>>         (int)num_online_cpus(), bogosum/(500000/HZ), (bogosum/(5000/HZ))%100);
>>
>> That is a complicated question - because linux-next also has patches
>> by Arjan that
>> change how (when) cpus are brought online. Initially I blamed his
>> patches and tried
>> reverting them ... and saw the symptom you are wondering about (message said
>> "Total of 1 processors", but the BogoMIPs was a number big enough to be all of
>> them. Thanks to you, I can now understand why.
>>
>> Fix will be to stop ia64 from messing directly with cpu_online_map?
> 
> Yes, and the other architectures.
> 


Right. And we should also ensure that nobody messes directly with
cpu_possible_map as well. I have written up a patch for ia64 (see below).
Sorry, I haven't even compile tested it - I neither have the toolchain nor the
hardware. I hope it works!

But don't expect the above printk statement to print the right value if you are
running a kernel which has the patch posted at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/31/286
applied. That is another patch that can alter boot-up time and many related
things. So, it would be best to test Venki's patch + following fix without having
Arjan's patch applied.

---
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ia64: Don't use cpu_set()/cpu_clear() over cpu_[online|possible]_map

Directly using cpu_set() and cpu_clear() on cpu_online_map or cpu_possible_map
is strongly discouraged. Use the functions set_cpu_online() and
set_cpu_possible() instead. This also means that the new implementation of
num_[online|possible]_cpus can track all changes to cpu_[online|possible]_mask
and hence give the correct results always.

Reported-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
index cd57d73..4d1a550 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ mark_bsp_online (void)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	/* If we register an early console, allow CPU 0 to printk */
-	cpu_set(smp_processor_id(), cpu_online_map);
+	set_cpu_online(smp_processor_id(), true);
 #endif
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/smp.c
index 0bd537b..8551979 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ stop_this_cpu(void)
 	/*
 	 * Remove this CPU:
 	 */
-	cpu_clear(smp_processor_id(), cpu_online_map);
+	set_cpu_online(smp_processor_id(), false);
 	max_xtp();
 	local_irq_disable();
 	cpu_halt();
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c
index 5590979..35f6e3c 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ smp_callin (void)
 	/* Setup the per cpu irq handling data structures */
 	__setup_vector_irq(cpuid);
 	notify_cpu_starting(cpuid);
-	cpu_set(cpuid, cpu_online_map);
+	set_cpu_online(cpuid, true);
 	per_cpu(cpu_state, cpuid) = CPU_ONLINE;
 	spin_unlock(&vector_lock);
 	ipi_call_unlock_irq();
@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ do_rest:
 	if (!cpu_isset(cpu, cpu_callin_map)) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "Processor 0x%x/0x%x is stuck.\n", cpu, sapicid);
 		ia64_cpu_to_sapicid[cpu] = -1;
-		cpu_clear(cpu, cpu_online_map);  /* was set in smp_callin() */
+		set_cpu_online(cpu, false);  /* was set in smp_callin() */
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	return 0;
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ smp_prepare_cpus (unsigned int max_cpus)
 	/*
 	 * We have the boot CPU online for sure.
 	 */
-	cpu_set(0, cpu_online_map);
+	set_cpu_online(0, true);
 	cpu_set(0, cpu_callin_map);
 
 	local_cpu_data->loops_per_jiffy = loops_per_jiffy;
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ smp_prepare_cpus (unsigned int max_cpus)
 
 void __devinit smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
 {
-	cpu_set(smp_processor_id(), cpu_online_map);
+	set_cpu_online(smp_processor_id(), true);
 	cpu_set(smp_processor_id(), cpu_callin_map);
 	set_numa_node(cpu_to_node_map[smp_processor_id()]);
 	per_cpu(cpu_state, smp_processor_id()) = CPU_ONLINE;
@@ -732,10 +732,10 @@ int __cpu_disable(void)
 			return -EBUSY;
 	}
 
-	cpu_clear(cpu, cpu_online_map);
+	set_cpu_online(cpu, false);
 
 	if (migrate_platform_irqs(cpu)) {
-		cpu_set(cpu, cpu_online_map);
+		set_cpu_online(cpu, true);
 		return -EBUSY;
 	}
 



  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-14 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-18  2:07 [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-01-18  5:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-18 18:52   ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-01-18 19:20     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-19 20:01       ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-01-19 20:40         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-21  1:01           ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-01-19 20:43         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-20 23:09           ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-01-20 23:45             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-20 23:55               ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-01-23  5:22                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-23 19:28                   ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-01-24  2:34                     ` [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus -v3 Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-01-24 19:22                       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-24 19:30                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-24 21:01                         ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-01-24 23:25                           ` [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus -v4 Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-01-26 17:22                             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-26 17:27                             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-26 21:25                               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-26 23:22                             ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-27 23:58                               ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-01  0:17                                 ` [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus -v5 Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-02-01 22:01                                   ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-02 20:03                                     ` Rusty Russell
2012-02-02 20:19                                       ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-02 21:00                                         ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-13 19:54                                       ` Tony Luck
2012-02-13 20:04                                         ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-13 20:25                                         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-13 20:43                                           ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-13 20:55                                             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-13 20:44                                           ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-13 21:57                                             ` Tony Luck
2012-02-14  9:25                                               ` Rusty Russell
2012-02-14 21:35                                                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2012-02-14 23:00                                                   ` Tony Luck
2012-02-14 22:49                                                 ` [PATCH 0/3] Cleanup raw handling of online/possible map Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-02-14 22:49                                                   ` [PATCH 1/3] hexagon: Avoid raw handling of cpu_possible_map Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-02-14 22:49                                                   ` [PATCH 2/3] mips: Avoid raw handling of cpu_possible_map/cpu_online_map Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-02-27 22:19                                                     ` David Daney
2012-02-14 22:49                                                   ` [PATCH 3/3] um: Avoid raw handling of cpu_online_map Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-02-27 21:55                                   ` [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus -v5 David Daney
2012-02-27 22:07                                     ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-27 22:16                                       ` David Daney
2012-03-01 18:32                                         ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-28  5:01                                       ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F3AD3B6.8070409@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tony.luck@gmail.com \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).