public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, venki@google.com,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/cpumask.c: Optimize __any_online_cpu() calculation
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:49:00 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3BBED4.2090101@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329310627.2437.18.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>

On 02/15/2012 06:27 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> Le mercredi 15 février 2012 à 18:05 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat a écrit :
>> __any_online_cpu() uses a for loop at the moment.
>> Instead, use cpumask_* operations to speed it up.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> Actually, the patch posted at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/15/101 removed
>> the last user of any_online_cpu() (and hence __any_online_cpu()).
>> However, since this is an exported symbol, I refrained from removing this
>> function altogether.
> 
> Just remove the export/function and eventually leave the helper ?
> 
> #define any_online_cpu(mask) cpumask_any_and(mask, cpu_online_mask)
> 


That sounds good. Here is v2 of the patch.
(Since this v2 touches include/linux/cpumask.h, I rebased it on top of the
patch posted at: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/15/2. Even without that
patch it should apply with minor line number changes..)

---
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] lib/cpumask.c: Remove __any_online_cpu()

__any_online_cpu() is not optimal and also unnecessary.
So, replace its use by faster cpumask_* operations.

Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 include/linux/cpumask.h |    3 +--
 lib/cpumask.c           |   12 ------------
 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index 42fec19..d3ccd2d 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -808,11 +808,10 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *get_cpu_mask(unsigned int cpu)
 #else /* NR_CPUS > 1 */
 int __first_cpu(const cpumask_t *srcp);
 int __next_cpu(int n, const cpumask_t *srcp);
-int __any_online_cpu(const cpumask_t *mask);
 
 #define first_cpu(src)		__first_cpu(&(src))
 #define next_cpu(n, src)	__next_cpu((n), &(src))
-#define any_online_cpu(mask) __any_online_cpu(&(mask))
+#define any_online_cpu(mask) cpumask_any_and(&mask, cpu_online_mask)
 #define for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask)			\
 	for ((cpu) = -1;				\
 		(cpu) = next_cpu((cpu), (mask)),	\
diff --git a/lib/cpumask.c b/lib/cpumask.c
index af3e5817..0470742 100644
--- a/lib/cpumask.c
+++ b/lib/cpumask.c
@@ -26,18 +26,6 @@ int __next_cpu_nr(int n, const cpumask_t *srcp)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(__next_cpu_nr);
 #endif
 
-int __any_online_cpu(const cpumask_t *mask)
-{
-	int cpu;
-
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
-		if (cpu_online(cpu))
-			break;
-	}
-	return cpu;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__any_online_cpu);
-
 /**
  * cpumask_next_and - get the next cpu in *src1p & *src2p
  * @n: the cpu prior to the place to search (ie. return will be > @n)



  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-15 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-15 12:35 [PATCH] lib/cpumask.c: Optimize __any_online_cpu() calculation Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-15 12:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 14:19   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2012-02-15 22:51     ` Rusty Russell
2012-02-17 12:19       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F3BBED4.2090101@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox