Re: Linux 3.3-rc4

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

On 02/20/2012 09:21 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> So it really is limited to only x86.
> 
> Oh, and if people really are using "uname()" to figure out that they
> are running a 64-bit kernel, then we should probably make uname() use
> "is_compat_task()" instead of checking the PER_LINUX32 personality.
> 
> So we already do have support for returning a different machine-name
> to 32-bit binaries, but it uses the "personality" thing that nobody
> cares about, rather than the compat layer. Looks like purely
> historical reasons.
> 

No, it serves a real function.  I use both directions of this to deal
with various compatibility things.  PER_LINUX32 lets you run, say, an
installer as if it was on a 32-bit program, even if it is written in a
scripting language (and hence running a native 64-bit interpreter).
Similarly, a 32-bit legacy binary can still function as part of a bigger
64-bit system.

So let's not change that just because someone did something idiotic.

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.