From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, mjg@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
keithp@keithp.com, rui.zhang@intel.com,
huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
matt.fleming@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86, efi: Delete efi_ioremap() and fix CONFIG_X86_32 oops
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:32:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F45B35D.1010702@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQWFpsZotawqPD4738jTayB=KOGo0W9+AT2go3GYk1v_sQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/22/2012 06:20 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> Why is MAXMEM used here?
>
> EFI reserved area could be above 4G?
>
> if that is the case, you will map all mmio hole below 4g.
>
OK, dropping this patch for now, at least from -urgent.
We really need to restrict the memory types we map, at least without
ioremap() called on them. In theory, on x86-64, we could have a
dedicated "1:1" address for each physical address, but there is no good
reason we should ever map memory types other than RAM, ACPI and EFI by
default -- with the possible exception of the low 1 MiB legacy area.
Therefore, I don't see why on Earth we have
kernel_physical_mapping_init() create mappings for areas which are not
RAM. It has access to the memory map at this point, so there is no
reason for it. Unfortunately I think we still have a bunch of code
which implicitly assumes the old "PC" model with separate contiguous
memory ranges starting at 0, 1 MiB, and 4 GiB, however, there are more
and more systems where that just doesn't match reality.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-23 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-20 13:30 [PATCH] x86, efi: Delete efi_ioremap() and fix CONFIG_X86_32 oops Matt Fleming
2012-02-23 1:16 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Matt Fleming
2012-02-23 2:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-23 3:32 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-02-23 10:36 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-02-24 4:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-28 2:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-07 10:30 ` Matt Fleming
2012-03-07 18:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-03-08 11:28 ` Matt Fleming
2012-03-08 18:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-03-12 12:38 ` Matt Fleming
2012-03-13 5:39 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-03-15 12:40 ` Matt Fleming
2012-03-15 17:54 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-03-16 18:36 ` Matt Fleming
2012-03-16 19:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-03-07 18:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-03-07 18:18 ` Matthew Garrett
2012-03-08 12:09 ` Matt Fleming
2012-03-04 0:12 ` Keith Packard
2012-03-04 0:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-04 1:33 ` Keith Packard
2012-03-05 10:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-07 18:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-03-05 11:48 ` Matt Fleming
2012-02-28 2:33 ` [PATCH] " H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-28 17:35 ` Matt Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F45B35D.1010702@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
--cc=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mjg@redhat.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).