public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Stephan Bärwolf" <stephan.baerwolf@tu-ilmenau.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: responsiveness: newer kernels causing lagging and blocking
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:30:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4669B1.4020306@tu-ilmenau.de> (raw)

Under various conditions linux since 2.6.39-rc1 laggs and blocks enormously the whole system.
(For example while starting "winecfg" (on a thinkpad X220) and parallel moving the
mousecursor you can observe a periodic blocking for some seconds)

After bisecting a little while, commit "4819d2e4310796c4e9eef674499af9b9caf36b5a"
(" drm: Retry i2c transfer of EDID block after failure ") seems to be responsible.

Because function "drm_do_probe_ddc_edid" loops trying "i2c_transfer" it consumes a lot
of time during errors. Reverting or changing "retries" from 5 to 1 extremly minimizes the
problem to "not perceptible".
It seems the locking within "i2c_transfer" slows everything down.
So maybe it is possible to yield() before calling it?


regards Stephan

             reply	other threads:[~2012-02-23 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-23 16:30 Stephan Bärwolf [this message]
2012-02-23 17:12 ` responsiveness: newer kernels causing lagging and blocking Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 17:26   ` Stephan Bärwolf
2012-02-23 17:21 ` Chris Wilson
2012-02-23 17:29   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 17:31     ` Dave Airlie
2012-02-23 18:15   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 19:52     ` [PATCH] drm: Reduce the number of retries whilst reading EDIDs Chris Wilson
2012-02-23 20:15       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 20:36         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23 21:36         ` Eugeni Dodonov
2012-02-23 21:40           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-24 15:17         ` Adam Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F4669B1.4020306@tu-ilmenau.de \
    --to=stephan.baerwolf@tu-ilmenau.de \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexdeucher@gmail.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox