From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu, ravitillo@lbl.gov,
khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, asharma@fb.com,
robert.richter@amd.com, ming.m.lin@intel.com,
vweaver1@eecs.utk.edu, andi@firstfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: auto-detect branch stack sampling mode
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:31:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F47AD6A.6080609@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBT1R_SJiQkjujS4dN5yQZPakjOmmCLNR3DmNxTmVT_p9A@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/24/12 8:28 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:24 PM, David Ahern<dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 2/24/12 2:40 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> This patch adds auto-detection of samples with taken branch stacks.
>>> The auto-detection avoids having to specify the -b or --branch-stack
>>> option on the cmdline.
>>>
>>> The patch adds a new feature bit HEADER_BRANCH_STACK to mark the
>>> presence of branch stacks in samples.
>>>
>>> You can now do:
>>> $ perf record -b any noploop 2
>>> $ perf report
>>> # Events: 8K cycles
>>> #
>>> # Overhead Command Source Shared Object Source Symbol Target
>>> Shared Object Target Symbol
>>> # ........ ....... .................... ...................
>>> .................... ..................
>>> #
>>> 91.56% noploop noploop [.] noploop
>>> noploop [.] noploop
>>> 0.42% noploop [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __lock_acquire
>>> [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __lock_acquire
>>>
>>>
>>> To force regular reporting based on the instruction address:
>>> $ perf report --no-branch-stack
>>> #
>>> # Events: 2K cycles
>>> #
>>> # Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
>>> # ........ ....... ................. ...............................
>>> #
>>> 92.03% noploop noploop [.] noploop
>>> 1.00% noploop [kernel.kallsyms] [k] lock_acquire
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian<eranian@google.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
>>> index 1c49d4e..5e833a2 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
>>> @@ -473,6 +473,9 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct perf_record *rec, int
>>> argc, const char **argv)
>>> if (!have_tracepoints(&evsel_list->entries))
>>> perf_header__clear_feat(&session->header,
>>> HEADER_TRACE_INFO);
>>>
>>> + if (!rec->opts.branch_stack)
>>> + perf_header__clear_feat(&session->header,
>>> HEADER_BRANCH_STACK);
>>
>>
>> branch tracing is user requested on, so shouldn't feature default off and
>> only be enabled when requested?
>>
> Well, what Ingo was suggesting is that perf report auto-detects whether or
> not branch mode is necessary by looking at the perf.data file. Most likely
> if you've recorded with -b, you are interested in a branch mode view rather
> that the instruction view (default). So all this does is elimintate the need
> to pass -b to perf report to enable branch mode.
Right. My point is that HEADER_BRANCH_STACK feature should be off by
default and only enabled by builtin-record when branch stack is
requested. You have the reverse -- enabled by default and off in record
if not requested.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-24 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-24 9:40 [PATCH] perf report: auto-detect branch stack sampling mode Stephane Eranian
2012-02-24 15:24 ` David Ahern
2012-02-24 15:28 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-02-24 15:31 ` David Ahern [this message]
2012-02-24 15:40 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-02-24 15:49 ` David Ahern
2012-02-24 15:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-03-02 17:47 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-03-02 19:08 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-03-03 19:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-03-05 10:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-05 11:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-05 15:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-05 15:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-05 15:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-05 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-05 16:32 ` Stephane Eranian
2012-03-05 17:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-05 20:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-03-05 21:43 ` Arun Sharma
2012-03-05 22:26 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-03-05 23:35 ` Arun Sharma
2012-03-06 3:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2012-03-06 6:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-06 6:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-07 1:57 ` [RFC] perf report: Implement symbol filtering on TUI Namhyung Kim
2012-03-07 6:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-07 8:04 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-03-08 10:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-09 1:53 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-03-09 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-09 8:03 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-03-14 23:11 ` Arun Sharma
2012-03-15 0:44 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-03-15 21:46 ` Arun Sharma
2012-03-05 15:52 ` [PATCH] perf report: auto-detect branch stack sampling mode Stephane Eranian
2012-03-07 12:49 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F47AD6A.6080609@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=asharma@fb.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravitillo@lbl.gov \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=vweaver1@eecs.utk.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).