From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] sched: Avoid unnecessary work in reweight_entity
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:21:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4B2105.4080306@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120227051021.GB28139@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 02/27/2012 01:10 PM, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> * Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2012-02-27 13:07:28]:
>
>>> Is that benchmark run in root (cpu) cgroup? If so, reweight_entity() should not
>>> kick in at all.
>>
>>
>> That's right, if no children group, 'reweight_entity' won't be called, so I have
>> created a cpuset group under root group named 'rg1', and created a memory group
>> under 'rg1' named 'sub', I attached the current shell to the 'sub' cgroup.
>
> 'cpu' and 'cpuset' cgroup resource controllers are separate. By above
> steps, you would still be running kern-bench in root cgroup as far as cpu
> cgroup controller is concerned ..
I think I really need some study on cgroup first...I've done some totally useless
test :( , but still confused that why sys time reduced?
And I got a server with Redhat now, so I will do:
1. cgcreate -g cpu:/subcg1
2. echo $$ > /cgroup/cpu/subcg1/tasks
3. open another shell
4. do 1~3 multi times, plan to get 7 cpu cgroup with 7 shell attached to each one.
5. run kernbench in each shell
Please tell me if I missed some thing :)
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> - vatsa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-27 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-06 9:37 [PATCH] sched: Avoid unnecessary work in reweight_entity Michael Wang
2012-02-06 10:31 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-07 2:18 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-07 2:36 ` [PATCH v2] " Michael Wang
2012-02-08 2:10 ` [PATCH v3] sched: " Michael Wang
2012-02-16 14:14 ` [PATCH v4] " Michael Wang
2012-02-16 14:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-17 2:28 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-17 6:03 ` [PATCH v5] " Michael Wang
2012-02-18 1:43 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-20 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-02-23 10:40 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-24 2:08 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-25 13:56 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-27 4:12 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2012-02-27 5:07 ` Michael Wang
2012-02-27 5:10 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2012-02-27 6:21 ` Michael Wang [this message]
2012-02-27 6:44 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2012-02-16 14:32 ` [PATCH v4] " Michael Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F4B2105.4080306@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).