public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com>
To: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@parallels.com>,
	"neilb@suse.de" <neilb@suse.de>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
	"bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"devel@openvz.org" <devel@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] SUNRPC: release per-net clients lock before calling PipeFS dentries creation
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:55:12 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4BB570.60105@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1330359695.5541.45.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>

27.02.2012 20:21, Myklebust, Trond пишет:
> On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 19:50 +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
>> Lockdep is sad otherwise, because inode mutex is taken on PipeFS dentry
>> creation, which can be called on mount notification, where this per-net client
>> lock is taken on clients list walk.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky<skinsbursky@parallels.com>
>>
>> ---
>>   net/sunrpc/clnt.c |   10 +++++++---
>>   1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
>> index bb7ed2f3..ddb5741 100644
>> --- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
>> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static void rpc_register_client(struct rpc_clnt *clnt)
>>   	struct sunrpc_net *sn = net_generic(clnt->cl_xprt->xprt_net, sunrpc_net_id);
>>
>>   	spin_lock(&sn->rpc_client_lock);
>> -	list_add(&clnt->cl_clients,&sn->all_clients);
>> +	list_add_tail(&clnt->cl_clients,&sn->all_clients);
>>   	spin_unlock(&sn->rpc_client_lock);
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -208,15 +208,19 @@ static int rpc_pipefs_event(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event,
>>   			    void *ptr)
>>   {
>>   	struct super_block *sb = ptr;
>> -	struct rpc_clnt *clnt;
>> +	struct rpc_clnt *clnt, *tmp;
>>   	int error = 0;
>>   	struct sunrpc_net *sn = net_generic(sb->s_fs_info, sunrpc_net_id);
>>
>>   	spin_lock(&sn->rpc_client_lock);
>> -	list_for_each_entry(clnt,&sn->all_clients, cl_clients) {
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(clnt, tmp,&sn->all_clients, cl_clients) {
>> +		atomic_inc(&clnt->cl_count);
>> +		spin_unlock(&sn->rpc_client_lock);
>>   		error = __rpc_pipefs_event(clnt, event, sb);
>> +		rpc_release_client(clnt);
>>   		if (error)
>>   			break;
>> +		spin_lock(&sn->rpc_client_lock);
>>   	}
>>   	spin_unlock(&sn->rpc_client_lock);
>>   	return error;
>>
>
> This won't be safe. Nothing guarantees that 'tmp' remains valid after
> you drop the spin_lock.
>
> I think you rather need to add a check for whether clnt->cl_dentry is in
> the right state (NULL if RPC_PIPEFS_UMOUNT or non-NULL if
> RPC_PIPEFS_MOUNT) before deciding whether or not to atomic_inc() and
> drop the lock, so that you can restart the loop after calling
> __rpc_pipefs_event().
>

Gmmm.
Please, correct me, if I'm wrong, that you are proposing something like this:

   	spin_lock(&sn->rpc_client_lock);
again:
	list_for_each_entry(clnt,&sn->all_clients, cl_clients) {
		if ((event == RPC_PIPEFS_MOUNT) && clnt->cl_dentry) ||
		    (event == RPC_PIPEFS_UMOUNT) && !clnt->cl_dentry))
			continue;
		atomic_inc(&clnt->cl_count);
		spin_unlock(&sn->rpc_client_lock);
    		error = __rpc_pipefs_event(clnt, event, sb);
		rpc_release_client(clnt);
		spin_lock(&sn->rpc_client_lock);
    		if (error)
    			break;
		goto again;
    	}
    	spin_unlock(&sn->rpc_client_lock);


-- 
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-27 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-27 15:50 [PATCH v2 0/4] SUNRPC: several fixes around PipeFS objects Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-02-27 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] SUNRPC: release per-net clients lock before calling PipeFS dentries creation Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-02-27 16:21   ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-02-27 16:55     ` Stanislav Kinsbursky [this message]
2012-02-27 17:11       ` David Laight
2012-02-27 17:37       ` Myklebust, Trond
2012-02-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] NFS: " Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-02-27 15:59   ` David Laight
2012-02-27 16:20     ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-02-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] SUNRPC: check RPC inode's pipe reference before dereferencing Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-02-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] SUNRPC: move waitq from RPC pipe to RPC inode Stanislav Kinsbursky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F4BB570.60105@parallels.com \
    --to=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox