From: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: notify host when guest paniced
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:08:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4D7AA4.3070801@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120228104528.GB24600@redhat.com>
At 02/28/2012 06:45 PM, Gleb Natapov Wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:19:47AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-02-28 10:42, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>> At 02/28/2012 05:34 PM, Jan Kiszka Wrote:
>>>> On 2012-02-28 09:23, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>>>> At 02/27/2012 11:08 PM, Jan Kiszka Wrote:
>>>>>> On 2012-02-27 04:01, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>>>>>> We can know the guest is paniced when the guest runs on xen.
>>>>>>> But we do not have such feature on kvm. This patch implemnts
>>>>>>> this feature, and the implementation is the same as xen:
>>>>>>> register panic notifier, and call hypercall when the guest
>>>>>>> is paniced.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>>>>>> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 8 ++++++--
>>>>>>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 8 ++++++--
>>>>>>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 13 +++++++++++--
>>>>>>> include/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
>>>>>>> include/linux/kvm_para.h | 1 +
>>>>>>> 6 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>>>>>>> index f0c6fd6..b928d1d 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>>>>>>> @@ -331,6 +331,17 @@ static struct notifier_block kvm_pv_reboot_nb = {
>>>>>>> .notifier_call = kvm_pv_reboot_notify,
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +static int
>>>>>>> +kvm_pv_panic_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long code, void *unused)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + kvm_hypercall0(KVM_HC_GUEST_PANIC);
>>>>>>> + return NOTIFY_DONE;
>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +static struct notifier_block kvm_pv_panic_nb = {
>>>>>>> + .notifier_call = kvm_pv_panic_notify,
>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You should split up host and guest-side changes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> static u64 kvm_steal_clock(int cpu)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> u64 steal;
>>>>>>> @@ -417,6 +428,7 @@ void __init kvm_guest_init(void)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> paravirt_ops_setup();
>>>>>>> register_reboot_notifier(&kvm_pv_reboot_nb);
>>>>>>> + atomic_notifier_chain_register(&panic_notifier_list, &kvm_pv_panic_nb);
>>>>>>> for (i = 0; i < KVM_TASK_SLEEP_HASHSIZE; i++)
>>>>>>> spin_lock_init(&async_pf_sleepers[i].lock);
>>>>>>> if (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_ASYNC_PF))
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>>>>>>> index 0b7690e..38b4705 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>>>>>>> @@ -1900,10 +1900,14 @@ static int halt_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> static int vmmcall_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> svm->next_rip = kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) + 3;
>>>>>>> skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
>>>>>>> - kvm_emulate_hypercall(&svm->vcpu);
>>>>>>> - return 1;
>>>>>>> + ret = kvm_emulate_hypercall(&svm->vcpu);
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + /* Ignore the error? */
>>>>>>> + return ret == 0 ? 0 : 1;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why can't kvm_emulate_hypercall return the right value?
>>>>>
>>>>> kvm_emulate_hypercall() will call kvm_hv_hypercall(), and
>>>>> kvm_hv_hypercall() will return 0 when vcpu's CPL > 0.
>>>>> If vcpu's CPL > 0, does kvm need to exit and tell it to
>>>>> qemu?
>>>>
>>>> No, there is currently no exit to userspace due to hypercalls, neither
>>>> of HV nor KVM kind.
>>>>
>>>> The point is that the return code of kvm_emulate_hypercall is unused so
>>>> far, so you can easily redefine it to encode continue vs. exit to
>>>> userspace. Once someone has different needs, this could still be
>>>> refactored again.
>>>
>>> So, it is OK to change the return value of kvm_hv_hypercall() if vcpu's
>>> CPL > 0?
>>
>> Yes, change it to encode what vendor modules need to return to their
>> callers.
>>
> Better introduce new request flag and set it in your hypercall emulation. See
> how triple fault is handled.
triple fault sets KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN and exits to userspace. Do you mean introduce
a new value(like KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN)?
Thanks
Wen Congyang
>
> --
> Gleb.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-29 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-27 3:01 [PATCH] kvm: notify host when guest paniced Wen Congyang
2012-02-27 3:05 ` [PATCH]qemu: deal with guest paniced event Wen Congyang
2012-02-27 8:59 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-03-01 16:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Luiz Capitulino
2012-03-02 0:40 ` Wen Congyang
2012-02-27 15:08 ` [PATCH] kvm: notify host when guest paniced Jan Kiszka
2012-02-28 5:26 ` Wen Congyang
2012-02-28 8:07 ` Wen Congyang
2012-02-28 8:23 ` Wen Congyang
2012-02-28 9:34 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-02-28 9:42 ` Wen Congyang
2012-02-28 10:19 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-02-28 10:45 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-02-29 1:08 ` Wen Congyang [this message]
2012-02-29 9:36 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-02-29 10:06 ` Wen Congyang
2012-02-28 11:23 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-29 1:29 ` Wen Congyang
2012-02-29 9:49 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-29 9:55 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-02-29 10:00 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-29 10:05 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-02-29 10:08 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-29 10:17 ` Wen Congyang
2012-02-29 10:39 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-01 3:34 ` Wen Congyang
2012-03-01 5:21 ` Wen Congyang
2012-02-29 10:44 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-02-29 10:48 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-29 10:52 ` Gleb Natapov
2012-02-29 9:58 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-02-29 10:05 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-29 10:19 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2012-02-29 10:44 ` Avi Kivity
2012-02-29 10:31 ` Wen Congyang
2012-02-29 10:46 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F4D7AA4.3070801@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).