From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
prashanth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com >> \"Paul E. McKenney\""
<paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bisected regression] sched: rebuild sched domains at suspend/resume
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 19:04:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5763CD.8050903@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120306204357.13169.90791.stgit@zurg>
On 03/07/2012 02:15 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> This is fix for suspend/resume regression introduced in commit 8f2f748b0656
> ("CPU hotplug, cpusets, suspend: Don't touch cpusets during suspend/resume")
> Without this patch suspend always hangs on my thinkpad x220 (2 x CPU * HT).
>
Hey, with commit 8f2f748b0656, suspend/resume works perfectly for me! I ran it
multiple times just to make sure, and everything worked just great.
Apart from that, I even tried suspend/resume after building the kernel with
and without CONFIG_CPUSETS. Both cases worked perfectly.
So, I am really surprised at what you stated above. Are you *really* sure you
are facing suspend hangs *because* of the above commit?
And AFAICS hardware doesn't matter for the code in question, but in any case,
the laptop on which I tested it is:
Thinkpad T420 (Intel core i5-2540M), 2 cores * HT (total 4 logical cpus).
Also, the patch you posted here doesn't make much sense.. nor does it give a
clue as to what might be wrong at your end (if anything is really wrong, that
is). Do you have CONFIG_CPUSETS set or unset? Could you share your .config?
Coming to your patch, assuming you have CONFIG_CPUSETS enabled, then,
calling rebuild_sched_domains() at that point is useless because the cpusets
weren't changed at all. So generate_sched_domains() would generate the same
sched domain partitions that is already there.. And hence
partition_sched_domains() would essentially do nothing.. no sched domain is
destroyed, and no new domains are created.
However, if CONFIG_CPUSETS is unset, then, before commit 8f2f748b0656,
partition_sched_domains(1, NULL, NULL) would have been invoked, thus rebuilding
a single sched domain. And that is why I specifically also tested commit
8f2f748b0656 with CONFIG_CPUSETS unset - and that also worked fine (as I
mentioned above).
So could you please check again?
By the way, you can use the pm-test framework (see Documentation/power/basic-
pm-debugging.txt) to pin-point which stage is causing the hang.
Specifically, the stage where CPU hotplug is done is 'processors'.
So you should probably try out this level:
# echo processors > /sys/power/pm_test
# echo mem > /sys/power/state
Replacing processors with core enables even deeper level suspend testing.
> cpuset_update_active_cpus() not only juggles with bits in cpusets,
> it also calls sched-domains rebuilding after all.
>
> This patch restores sched-domain rebuilds, as it was before that commit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 9995eb0..0fb7406 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -6732,6 +6732,10 @@ static int cpuset_cpu_active(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action,
> case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
> cpuset_update_active_cpus();
> return NOTIFY_OK;
> + case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN:
> + case CPU_DOWN_FAILED_FROZEN:
> + rebuild_sched_domains();
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> default:
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> }
> @@ -6744,6 +6748,9 @@ static int cpuset_cpu_inactive(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action,
> case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
> cpuset_update_active_cpus();
> return NOTIFY_OK;
> + case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN:
> + rebuild_sched_domains();
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> default:
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> }
>
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-07 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-06 20:45 [PATCH bisected regression] sched: rebuild sched domains at suspend/resume Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-06 21:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-06 21:47 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-07 0:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-07 1:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-07 1:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-03-11 19:44 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-12 11:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-12 11:56 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-04-23 13:14 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-04-24 17:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-03-07 13:34 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2012-03-07 14:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-07 15:40 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2012-03-07 15:49 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F5763CD.8050903@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=prashanth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox