Re: [PATCH 0/3] power: max17042_battery: Add DT bindings

[Karol Lewandowski <k.lewandowsk@samsung.com>]

Dear MungJoo,

I wasn't aware of Dirk's patchset and thus, I didn't ever try to make my
patches compatible with it.

I've found hopefully correct patchset[1] via google - it's mailing list
posting without any feedback...  I've checked linux-next and it clearly
hasn't been merged.

I'm happy to rework my patch but I would like to ask you about specific
tree I should base on.  Is this patchset in some subsystem-specific
(power?) tree? Other?

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/24/237

Regards,
-- 
Karol Lewandowski | Samsung Poland R&D Center | Linux/Platform

On 09.03.2012 01:16, 함명주 wrote:

> Dear Karol Lewandowski,
> 
> I've been confused this patchset with Dirk Brandewie's MAX17042 patchset; I though this was a follow-up version of Dirk's, which I think already acked by me.
> 
> Anyway, the patches themselves look fine.
> 
> However, have you checked the compatibility (mergability?) with the recent MAX17042 patches of Dirk Brandewie? I'm not sure about the merge status of Dirk's patchset, but, I think you need to consider his patches as they massively reshaped the device driver.
> 
> Other than that, the patches look fine. (If that issue is already considered, regard this as an Acked-by.)
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
> Cheers!
> MyungJoo.
> 
> ------- Original Message -------
> Sender : Karol Lewandowski<k.lewandowsk@samsung.com> Junior Software Engineer/SPRC-Linux (MSD)/삼성전자
> Date : 2012-03-08 19:32 (GMT+09:00)
> Title : Re: [PATCH 0/3] power: max17042_battery: Add DT bindings
> 
> Dear MyungJoo Ham,
> 
> Could you take a look at patchset I've sent? It's needed to make use of
> max17042 driver on device tree-enabled platforms.
> 
> Regards,