From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932424Ab2CIRcl (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:32:41 -0500 Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.12]:51628 "EHLO mailout2.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757759Ab2CIRck (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:32:40 -0500 Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 18:32:37 +0100 From: Karol Lewandowski Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] power: max17042_battery: Add DT bindings In-reply-to: <33272430.5261331252254898.JavaMail.weblogic@epml04> To: myungjoo.ham@samsung.com Cc: DirkBrandewie , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <4F5A3EB5.5040405@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111109 Icedove/8.0 References: <33272430.5261331252254898.JavaMail.weblogic@epml04> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dear MungJoo, I wasn't aware of Dirk's patchset and thus, I didn't ever try to make my patches compatible with it. I've found hopefully correct patchset[1] via google - it's mailing list posting without any feedback... I've checked linux-next and it clearly hasn't been merged. I'm happy to rework my patch but I would like to ask you about specific tree I should base on. Is this patchset in some subsystem-specific (power?) tree? Other? [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/24/237 Regards, -- Karol Lewandowski | Samsung Poland R&D Center | Linux/Platform On 09.03.2012 01:16, 함명주 wrote: > Dear Karol Lewandowski, > > I've been confused this patchset with Dirk Brandewie's MAX17042 patchset; I though this was a follow-up version of Dirk's, which I think already acked by me. > > Anyway, the patches themselves look fine. > > However, have you checked the compatibility (mergability?) with the recent MAX17042 patches of Dirk Brandewie? I'm not sure about the merge status of Dirk's patchset, but, I think you need to consider his patches as they massively reshaped the device driver. > > Other than that, the patches look fine. (If that issue is already considered, regard this as an Acked-by.) > > Thank you. > > > Cheers! > MyungJoo. > > ------- Original Message ------- > Sender : Karol Lewandowski Junior Software Engineer/SPRC-Linux (MSD)/삼성전자 > Date : 2012-03-08 19:32 (GMT+09:00) > Title : Re: [PATCH 0/3] power: max17042_battery: Add DT bindings > > Dear MyungJoo Ham, > > Could you take a look at patchset I've sent? It's needed to make use of > max17042 driver on device tree-enabled platforms. > > Regards,