From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754574Ab2CLOep (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:34:45 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:58305 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751662Ab2CLOen (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:34:43 -0400 Message-ID: <4F5E097F.1040709@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:34:39 -0700 From: Dirk Brandewie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: myungjoo.ham@samsung.com CC: dirk.brandewie@gmail.com, Karol Lewandowski , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Anton Vorontsov , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] power: max17042_battery: Add DT bindings References: <17763564.55121331517212251.JavaMail.weblogic@epml04> In-Reply-To: <17763564.55121331517212251.JavaMail.weblogic@epml04> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi All, On 03/11/2012 06:53 PM, 함명주 wrote: > Karol Lewandowski, 2012-03-10 02:32 (GMT+09:00) >> Dear MungJoo, >> >> I wasn't aware of Dirk's patchset and thus, I didn't ever try to make my >> patches compatible with it. >> >> I've found hopefully correct patchset[1] via google - it's mailing list >> posting without any feedback... I've checked linux-next and it clearly >> hasn't been merged. >> >> I'm happy to rework my patch but I would like to ask you about specific >> tree I should base on. Is this patchset in some subsystem-specific >> (power?) tree? Other? > > Dear Karol, > > I preferred Dirk's patchset included because it is for the correctness of the device driver. > > However, as Dirk's patchset has not been updated or merged for long, I guess you may go ahead trying to merge this DT patchset first. > My patch set was updated on 24/1/12 and has all my changes to date. I am not sure why it has not been merged Anton, David? > It appears that this patchset does not force much trouble for Dirk's side as the two are virtually disjoint and it seems rebasing Dirk's patchset upon this patchset trivial though I didn't try that yet. > Agreed, I would like to see my patches make the 3.4 though since they have been out for a while > Anyway, please consider "Acked-by" from me for the patches. > > > Cheers! > MyungJoo. > >> >> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/24/237 >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Karol Lewandowski | Samsung Poland R&D Center | Linux/Platform >> >> On 09.03.2012 01:16, 함명주 wrote: >> >>> Dear Karol Lewandowski, >>> >>> I've been confused this patchset with Dirk Brandewie's MAX17042 patchset; I though this was a follow-up version of Dirk's, which I think already acked by me. >>> >>> Anyway, the patches themselves look fine. >>> >>> However, have you checked the compatibility (mergability?) with the recent MAX17042 patches of Dirk Brandewie? I'm not sure about the merge status of Dirk's patchset, but, I think you need to consider his patches as they massively reshaped the device driver. >>> >>> Other than that, the patches look fine. (If that issue is already considered, regard this as an Acked-by.) >>> >>> Thank you. >>> >>> >>> Cheers! >>> MyungJoo. >>> >>> ------- Original Message ------- >>> Sender : Karol Lewandowski Junior Software Engineer/SPRC-Linux (MSD)/삼성전자 >>> Date : 2012-03-08 19:32 (GMT+09:00) >>> Title : Re: [PATCH 0/3] power: max17042_battery: Add DT bindings >>> >>> Dear MyungJoo Ham, >>> >>> Could you take a look at patchset I've sent? It's needed to make use of >>> max17042 driver on device tree-enabled platforms. >>> >>> Regards, >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > > MyungJoo Ham (함명주), PHD > > System S/W Lab, S/W Platform Team, Software Center > Samsung Electronics > Cell: +82-10-6714-2858 > > > > >