From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Kushal Das <kdas@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Extending coredump note section to contain filenames
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:31:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5E956F.3070108@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120313002725.GA17828@host2.jankratochvil.net>
On 03/12/2012 05:27 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:16:30 +0100, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> That's quite absurd if you think about it... we're talking about each
>> individual library, not necessarily the root binary.
>
> Denys is also working on ABRT which already dumps a lot of useful info
> associated with a core file:
> abrt_version analyzer architecture cmdline component coredump count
> dso_list environ executable hostname kernel maps os_release package
> pid pwd reason time uid username uuid var_log_messages
>
> I find the local copy instances of the files of specific build the same or
> even less less useful info than those files above.
>
> One should start implementing dumping all the info above info Linux kernel
> before the filenames are worth it.
>
This is basically providing the dso_list and executable information.
Several of the other things you list above (cmdline, environ, pid,
reason, maps) are already part of a core file. The rest sounds like an
RFE to me.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-13 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-09 17:13 Extending coredump note section to contain filenames Denys Vlasenko
2012-03-09 17:29 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-12 12:05 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-03-12 12:13 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-03-12 16:53 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-12 18:58 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-03-12 19:08 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-12 19:45 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-03-12 22:07 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-12 22:16 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-13 12:12 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-03-13 12:19 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-12 22:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-12 22:31 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-13 0:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-13 0:27 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-13 0:31 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-03-13 0:36 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-13 0:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-13 0:46 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-03-13 0:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F5E956F.3070108@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=kdas@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox