From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, sameo@linux.intel.com,
broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
myungjoo.ham@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] input: add MAX8997-haptic driver
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 14:39:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5EDD78.4070701@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120313053035.GB9449@core.coreip.homeip.net>
On 03/13/2012 02:30 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 05:31:24PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>> On 03/07/2012 05:29 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 05:02:49PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>>> MAX8997 has several features in a single chip,
>>>> This patchset supports unimplemented haptic driver of MAX8997.
>>>>
>>>> v2
>>>> - code clean and remove unnecessary code according to comment of Dmitry
>>>> Torokhov
>>>
>>> Could you please tell me if the version of the patch I sent to you
>>> worked or not?
>>
>> It isn't worked because it use the mutex lock in irq handler stack.
>> so, I resend v3 patch of max8997-haptic driver after modifying it.
>
> Hmm, my patch did not add taking mutex in irq context, I presume you are
> talking about max8997->iolock that is taken in max8997_write_reg... OK,
> I see...
>
You're right. I'm sorry about my ambiguous reply for you.
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-13 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-07 8:02 [PATCH v2 0/2] input: add MAX8997-haptic driver Chanwoo Choi
2012-03-07 8:29 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-03-12 8:31 ` Chanwoo Choi
2012-03-13 5:30 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-03-13 5:39 ` Chanwoo Choi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F5EDD78.4070701@samsung.com \
--to=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox