From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755899Ab2CMHM5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2012 03:12:57 -0400 Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]:14829 "EHLO mailout3.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753177Ab2CMHM4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Mar 2012 03:12:56 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfee61b-b7c62ae000000989-10-4f5ef376bf99 Message-id: <4F5EF376.3060909@samsung.com> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:12:54 +0900 From: Chanwoo Choi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Venu Byravarasu Cc: Kyungmin Park , "sameo@linux.intel.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "myungjoo.ham@samsung.com" Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] MFD: MAX77693: add MAX77693 MFD driver References: <4F5EDB01.9070308@samsung.com> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/13/2012 02:52 PM, Venu Byravarasu wrote: >> So we decide to use legacy way. As regmap is not yet tested. So we >> summit the current way and revise it later. > > I was under the impression that regmap is stable now. Can you > plz let me know, what kind of problems you are seeing with > regmap? As I'm also planning to upstream a MFD using regmap > very soon, this information will be useful. I had plan for using regmap for i2c read/write operation on later patch. But I haven't yet tested max77693 driver with regmap for i2c, so I posted max77693 mfd driver which was tested by using i2c legacy way. Thank you, Chanwoo Choi