From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031043Ab2CNVpl (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:45:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22554 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964781Ab2CNVpk (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:45:40 -0400 Message-ID: <4F611169.2020205@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:45:13 -0400 From: Doug Ledford User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: KOSAKI Motohiro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, KOSAKI Motohiro , Amerigo Wang , Jiri Slaby , "\"Eric W. Biederman\" (commit_signer:2/9=22%)" , "Joe Korty (commit_signer:2/9=22%)" , "David Howells (commit_signer:2/9=22%)" Subject: Re: [resend][PATCH 1/3] mqueue: revert bump up DFLT_*MAX References: <1323470163-8723-1-git-send-email-kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> <4EEE3124.7070605@gmail.com> <20111218103836.258eedb8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4F610D81.3020300@redhat.com> <20120314143832.286b497e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20120314143832.286b497e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF3A0BD48CDE484153EB41375" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF3A0BD48CDE484153EB41375 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/14/2012 05:38 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:28:33 -0400 > Doug Ledford wrote: >=20 >> This has obviously fallen through the cracks. >=20 > It sure has. Please dig out whatever is the currently favored > patchset, refresh, retest and resend, with changelogging which fully > covers the reasoning and decision process? OK, completely redoing patch set then against current Linus tree. Motohiro, would you be so kind as to resend my your patches that went on top of mine and I'll create a complete patch set? >> so that if there are any apps out there that have been coded to expect= >> this behavior, then there is a workaround path for them until they get= >> coded >=20 > We'll be especially interested in the implications of this part. Certainly. --=20 Doug Ledford GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD http://people.redhat.com/dledford --------------enigF3A0BD48CDE484153EB41375 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPYRFpAAoJELgmozMOVy/d8cAQAKW/umN/3ukoqG6pOBATI2Xw a48WMoATMHiz26uI8F/Ukyb0L40vCmrSPXsr3BUvyPqc3POsZbyeLzEMsMy/QyqL FvyfOBD+mEVZNcEWDLXin4v3P0YJ1v30qv+Plgh2HIbfxFkEreKq3spr8UH5Y/FH g9vdqE4eXN5jaePlTC3SeY8co+7VFRj/AOT930XQOtB2qyE+SzfRBWW5VpZG0ofF Vs3cZX9rH1aGUN3hlyiHZqHm4sQdt/H1DGPwUYEM5PFjQdoQUtssadH8Fp0JwehY sucpvFpaCdpQAneVTMvNs4L9f1l5yEVWgE3TwptvGIVeEPTH+6JUrLGw+As50J5b w6MTcnAUWGEzjpzuOK1F+eUAj9SfzejUQv56MtHY3e1YqPGNrt2TpLsW+COBBlhD Iv/iV8XN/fSI9yrGfdGfM/3nToxfEmNuVWZxASQcgfRGyKa08jFa7Y8iPKJq2eWu E9LqJLoSLxsz6rL4UlyCg3ssDh0xe9CYKAVj5o1lq4gUcIUTx0naoRBrugJg72JP VBviDhoxntVfcm8VIjhlh/vaPJDcXtqXpynH4OyJf3JlQ94yPPpqJNk0RamdDb2o 5tCX55NCJwi/vbzsmG57IsK1/Zl7pjI2lNV3WrXUMKG/euCnR8fo4+xO61uP3JZU TaZ4dd/Elp7wZ7Fs4lxF =Ju7l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF3A0BD48CDE484153EB41375--