From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760185Ab2CPI5i (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2012 04:57:38 -0400 Received: from e28smtp02.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.2]:60568 "EHLO e28smtp02.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753830Ab2CPI5f (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2012 04:57:35 -0400 Message-ID: <4F62F9C8.6090803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:28:56 +0800 From: Xiao Guangrong User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Takuya Yoshikawa CC: avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: Switch to srcu-less get_dirty_log() References: <20120301193007.04b2db8e.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> <20120301193316.96682d60.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> <4F62C9B4.7060804@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120316155511.70455b4a.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> <4F62EC25.5060306@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120316165547.4df2abe4.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20120316165547.4df2abe4.yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-cbid: 12031608-5816-0000-0000-000001C20910 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/16/2012 03:55 PM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: > On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:30:45 +0800 > Xiao Guangrong wrote: > >>>> There is a example: >>>> >>>> CPU A CPU B >>>> guest page is written by write-emulation >>>> >>>> hold mmu-lock and see dirty-bitmap >>>> is not be changed, then migration is >>>> completed. >>> >>> We do not allow this break. >>> >> >> >> Hmm? what can avoid this? Could you please point it out? > > Stopping the guest before actualy migrating the guest means VCPU threads > must be back in the userspace at the moment, no? > > So when the final GET_DIRTY_LOG is being executed, thread A cannot be > in KVM. > >> The problem is the guest page is written before dirty-bitmap is set, >> we may log the dirty page in this window like above case... > > Exactly, but the next GET_DIRTY_LOG call can take that because, as I > wrote above, at this time the GET_DIRTY_LOG must not be the final one. > Thanks for your explanation, maybe you are right, i do not know migration much. What i worried about is, you have changed the behaviour of GET_DIRTY_LOG, in the current one, it can get all the dirty pages when it is called; after your change, GET_DIRTY_LOG can get a empty dirty bitmap but dirty page exists. Migration may work correctly depends on the final GET_DIRTY_LOG, in that time, guest is stopped. But i am not sure whether other components using GET_DIRTY_LOG are happy, e.g. frame-buffer.