From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1032150Ab2CSQqr (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:46:47 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:40862 "EHLO mail-wg0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030563Ab2CSQqp (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:46:45 -0400 Message-ID: <4F6762F1.7050902@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:46:41 +0100 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120314 Thunderbird/12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Perches CC: "Ted Ts'o" , Andreas Dilger , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] ext4: Use pr_fmt and pr_ References: <20120319040950.GG31682@thunk.org> <1332131137.23125.44.camel@joe2Laptop> In-Reply-To: <1332131137.23125.44.camel@joe2Laptop> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/19/2012 05:25 AM, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 00:09 -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote: >> One evidence that this patch is noise is that it doesn't apply cleanly >> just on top of my current patch set that I plan to send to Linus. > > That's crap for evidence. > > It's more evident that you don't make > public your own internal patch queue > quickly enough than anything else. Please stop repeating that shit. I already explained you the reasons. A couple of weeks ago. thanks, -- js