From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: dledford@redhat.com
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
amwang@redhat.com, jslaby@suse.cz, ebiederm@xmission.com,
joe.korty@ccur.com, dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [resend][PATCH 1/3] mqueue: revert bump up DFLT_*MAX
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:49:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F679BF2.7040107@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79ac1725-6aa2-4d67-8b59-cbf752ea9f3e@zmail13.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
On 3/19/2012 2:16 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On 3/14/2012 5:45 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
>>> On 03/14/2012 05:38 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:28:33 -0400
>>>> Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This has obviously fallen through the cracks.
>>>>
>>>> It sure has. Please dig out whatever is the currently favored
>>>> patchset, refresh, retest and resend, with changelogging which
>>>> fully
>>>> covers the reasoning and decision process?
>>>
>>> OK, completely redoing patch set then against current Linus tree.
>>>
>>> Motohiro, would you be so kind as to resend my your patches that
>>> went on
>>> top of mine and I'll create a complete patch set?
>>
>> I'm sorry. I already have a rebased patch. but I haven't posted. I
>> have toa
>> hurry.
>
> Actually, I already pulled them from the lkml archives and fixed up
> the one patch that didn't apply cleanly. The only reason I haven't
> sent the entire patchset out yet is that I'm writing a test/verification
> app to go along with it.
OK, I'll stop this work then. Good luck. :)
But, please rebase the patch on top linux-next. It's more akpm happy and
you are going to see more conflicts. That's the reason why I thought I
need more tests.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-19 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-09 22:35 [resend][PATCH 1/3] mqueue: revert bump up DFLT_*MAX kosaki.motohiro
2011-12-09 22:35 ` [resend][PATCH 2/3] mqueue: don't use kmalloc with KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE kosaki.motohiro
2011-12-09 22:35 ` [resend][PATCH 3/3] mqueue: separate mqueue default value from maximum value kosaki.motohiro
2011-12-18 18:29 ` [resend][PATCH 1/3] mqueue: revert bump up DFLT_*MAX KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-12-18 18:29 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-12-18 18:38 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-14 21:28 ` Doug Ledford
2012-03-14 21:38 ` Andrew Morton
2012-03-14 21:45 ` Doug Ledford
2012-03-19 18:02 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-03-19 18:16 ` Doug Ledford
2012-03-19 20:49 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F679BF2.7040107@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=joe.korty@ccur.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox