public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@mvista.com>
Cc: KGDB Mailing List <kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH 4/4] kgdb: x86: Detach gdb if machine shuts down or reboots
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 06:46:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F686E2A.3090100@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F6867A1.5020906@mvista.com>

On 03/20/2012 06:18 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 20-03-2012 5:00, Jason Wessel wrote:
>
>>> An arch-independent hook has its advantages, no question. Maybe we
>>> should just start this way and then evolved on top as needed.
>> Sounds good to me.  I added the reboot notifier patch into the merge queue for kgdb/kdb.
>>> I was wondering why those other archs do not use the notifier. Maybe one
>>> motivation is to avoid that too much code is excluded from the debugger
>>> by detaching too early. Could possibly be addressed by making
>>> detach-on-reboot runtime configurable.
>> There really isn't a whole lot of code between reboot hook invoked from kernel_restart_prepare(),
>> and the place where the reset is invoked.  Specifically it looked like:
>>          usermodehelper_disable();
>>          device_shutdown();
>>          syscore_shutdown();
>>          machine_restart(cmd);
>> Attached is the patch you asked for the conditional behavior with respect to the reboot hook.
>     You forgot to attach it?

Source Forge [kgdb mailling list] is eating attachments.  I had definitely attached it.  See: 

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/19/735

I also included this patch in the potential merge queue as patch 5 of 5, sent to the kgdb mailing list.

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=29008292

Jason.


Jason.

      reply	other threads:[~2012-03-20 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-16 12:17 [PATCH 0/4] kgdb: Small usability improvements for x86 Jan Kiszka
2012-03-16 12:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] kgdb: x86: Return all segment registers also in 64-bit mode Jan Kiszka
2012-03-16 15:57   ` Jason Wessel
2012-03-19 13:52     ` Jan Kiszka
2012-03-19 20:52       ` Jason Wessel
2012-03-16 12:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] kgdb: Make gdbstub_exit a nop unless gdb is attached Jan Kiszka
2012-03-16 16:04   ` Jason Wessel
2012-03-16 12:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] kgdb: Respect that flush op is optional Jan Kiszka
2012-03-16 12:46   ` Jason Wessel
2012-03-16 12:53     ` Jan Kiszka
2012-03-16 16:16       ` Jason Wessel
2012-03-16 12:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] kgdb: x86: Detach gdb if machine shuts down or reboots Jan Kiszka
2012-03-16 15:36   ` Jason Wessel
2012-03-19 13:49     ` Jan Kiszka
2012-03-20  1:00       ` Jason Wessel
2012-03-20 11:18         ` [Kgdb-bugreport] " Sergei Shtylyov
2012-03-20 11:46           ` Jason Wessel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F686E2A.3090100@windriver.com \
    --to=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sshtylyov@mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox