* [PATCH] Documentation/CodingStyle: Add guidelines for inline assembly
@ 2012-02-02 22:33 Josh Triplett
2012-03-20 20:46 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Josh Triplett @ 2012-02-02 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-doc; +Cc: Randy Dunlap, Linus Torvalds, Joe Perches
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
---
Documentation/CodingStyle | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/CodingStyle b/Documentation/CodingStyle
index 2b90d32..c58b236 100644
--- a/Documentation/CodingStyle
+++ b/Documentation/CodingStyle
@@ -793,6 +793,35 @@ own custom mode, or may have some other magic method for making indentation
work correctly.
+ Chapter 19: Inline assembly
+
+In architecture-specific code, you may need to use inline assembly to interface
+with CPU or platform functionality. Don't hesitate to do so when necessary.
+However, don't use inline assembly gratuitously when C can do the job. You can
+and should poke hardware from C when possible.
+
+Consider writing simple helper functions that wrap common bits of inline
+assembly, rather than repeatedly writing them with slight variations. Remember
+that inline assembly can use C parameters.
+
+Large, non-trivial assembly functions should go in .S files, with corresponding
+C prototypes defined in C header files. The C prototypes for assembly
+functions should use "asmlinkage".
+
+You may need to mark your asm statement as volatile, to prevent GCC from
+removing it if GCC doesn't notice any side effects. You don't always need to
+do so, though, and doing so unnecessarily can limit optimization.
+
+When writing a single inline assembly statement containing multiple
+instructions, put each instruction on a separate line in a separate quoted
+string, and end each string except the last with \n\t to properly indent the
+next instruction in the assembly output:
+
+ asm ("magic %reg1, #42\n\t"
+ "more_magic %reg2, %reg3"
+ : /* outputs */ : /* inputs */ : /* clobbers */);
+
+
Appendix I: References
--
1.7.9
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation/CodingStyle: Add guidelines for inline assembly
2012-02-02 22:33 [PATCH] Documentation/CodingStyle: Add guidelines for inline assembly Josh Triplett
@ 2012-03-20 20:46 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2012-03-20 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Josh Triplett; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-doc, Linus Torvalds, Joe Perches
On 02/02/2012 02:33 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Applied. Thanks.
> ---
> Documentation/CodingStyle | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/CodingStyle b/Documentation/CodingStyle
> index 2b90d32..c58b236 100644
> --- a/Documentation/CodingStyle
> +++ b/Documentation/CodingStyle
> @@ -793,6 +793,35 @@ own custom mode, or may have some other magic method for making indentation
> work correctly.
>
>
> + Chapter 19: Inline assembly
> +
> +In architecture-specific code, you may need to use inline assembly to interface
> +with CPU or platform functionality. Don't hesitate to do so when necessary.
> +However, don't use inline assembly gratuitously when C can do the job. You can
> +and should poke hardware from C when possible.
> +
> +Consider writing simple helper functions that wrap common bits of inline
> +assembly, rather than repeatedly writing them with slight variations. Remember
> +that inline assembly can use C parameters.
> +
> +Large, non-trivial assembly functions should go in .S files, with corresponding
> +C prototypes defined in C header files. The C prototypes for assembly
> +functions should use "asmlinkage".
> +
> +You may need to mark your asm statement as volatile, to prevent GCC from
> +removing it if GCC doesn't notice any side effects. You don't always need to
> +do so, though, and doing so unnecessarily can limit optimization.
> +
> +When writing a single inline assembly statement containing multiple
> +instructions, put each instruction on a separate line in a separate quoted
> +string, and end each string except the last with \n\t to properly indent the
> +next instruction in the assembly output:
> +
> + asm ("magic %reg1, #42\n\t"
> + "more_magic %reg2, %reg3"
> + : /* outputs */ : /* inputs */ : /* clobbers */);
> +
> +
>
> Appendix I: References
>
--
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-20 20:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-02 22:33 [PATCH] Documentation/CodingStyle: Add guidelines for inline assembly Josh Triplett
2012-03-20 20:46 ` Randy Dunlap
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).