From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757531Ab2CUOye (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:54:34 -0400 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:49304 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757778Ab2CUOyd (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:54:33 -0400 Message-ID: <4F69EBA3.9010709@canonical.com> Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:54:27 -0400 From: Joseph Salisbury User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: arjan@linux.intel.com CC: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kerneloops.org References: <4F692089.3080006@canonical.com> <20120321095402.58707af4@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120321095402.58707af4@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/21/2012 05:54 AM, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:27:53 -0400 > Joseph Salisbury wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> It appears the kerneloops.org website has been off-line since the recent >> break in of kernel.org. Does anyone happen to know if the >> kerneloops.org site will eventually be brought back on-line? > > Just set up a new one. It's become a farce to the point the former > operator of the site won't even reply to email on the subject. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ Sorry, I didn't notice there was already a discussion on this topic[0] before I sent my query. Does anyone know if there is a backup of the former kerneloops.org environment? If so, it would be great if it was checked in somewhere, so it can be shared and improved upon. Then it can be re-deployed without having to re-invent the wheel. Thanks, Joe [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/14/391 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPaeuJAAoJEGzvPSfKWxQetWEQAJJgpqrM++A+RLYiesaYSJ4z lZIigmMxbTLQX75uRyqjAD7HFMiWZHUjjItmRm4jbARIajI1HtKRaZU7WWQ3npg5 n1DDFu0TxcE4WJZDW9AYBc1qobcBWbAcYoJSxl7MccaaHIMEi1f+EeTYS4kxvqm9 h0EedA/sIlp29cQJBbPrzwKRMFscz5EnarhQ1rhqebG0r2i2sDbgk4V9r9WWrsrk eFqxLxhNhg2fPrxp5rOq/D/3D7G0RK0tfW/AOguSmGnHr+N8GEWHxc23KYmz5jFS 5SQMt3ZS4Cn0XqruolPntm//pA+p7z/GhlmdNq/1NhipAaNoOFfGs7R3CcSxJ/gq o2oT4aV/nGo/CQ32dRhrN0jP0bpiG0CdlGfuzJfg0uM1NI9nXuUCEsQi38w8SfW1 t76cEBFFty/bltectVJtfLb6xLxQ77Ekbrg1SivEqNcCvfARzrH+yxJIcMaf61HN IwgWfpYP8r98WUlcY9DCsmT/ZInDL/v4EqTh4eQt69X0juUqqcgPR3vPX4x5Lkti HBBeQ3RVlWTtmuK61nHyAlsdzNZK87/65L6huxDCLk5D6joluZotKkS3qxOaxQFC YfG7rvVW53FL3KrbQ3NwAs97qRHTxdtbN3KvKFSPZaiJJ0HWptwZyf7WCLrxmdr4 Sv9djMTvm2KiQAZqwJzX =WUu+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----