From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030981Ab2CVQ4b (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:56:31 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:39412 "EHLO mail-ee0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756569Ab2CVQ42 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:56:28 -0400 Message-ID: <4F6B59B9.90902@suse.cz> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:56:25 +0100 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120320 Thunderbird/13.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" CC: Phil Carmody , apw@canonical.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] checkpatch.pl: thou shalt not use () or (...) in function declarations References: <1332430038-21057-1-git-send-email-ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com> <4F6B51C9.6010904@suse.cz> <4F6B5902.1080607@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <4F6B5902.1080607@zytor.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/22/2012 05:53 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > having declarators > and definitions be different is just asking for trouble. Yes, agreed. -- js suse labs