From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754722Ab2CVSbX (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:31:23 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:40665 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751684Ab2CVSbV (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:31:21 -0400 Message-ID: <4F6B6FDB.80507@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:30:51 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120209 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBCaWXDn21hbm4=?= CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , x86@kernel.org, Michal Marek , Matt Fleming , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, build: remove unused include References: <1329324589-26907-1-git-send-email-andreas@biessmann.de> <20120322101719.GC1406@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20120322101719.GC1406@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/22/2012 03:17 AM, Andreas Bießmann wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 05:49:49PM +0100, Andreas Bießmann wrote: >> Commit 079f85e624189292d1c818b47764916bf8cf84a8 removed necessity for >> sys/sysmacros.h include but missed to remove the include. >> >> Still requiring sys/sysmacros.h for build tool breaks cross compiling x86 kernel >> on non linux style systems which may not offer sys/sysmacros.h. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmann >> --- >> arch/x86/boot/tools/build.c | 1 - >> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/tools/build.c b/arch/x86/boot/tools/build.c >> index 4e9bd6b..52628cd 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/boot/tools/build.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/tools/build.c >> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ >> #include >> #include >> #include >> -#include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> -- > > are there any objections against that patch? could anyone take it if not? An equivalent patch has been in tip:x86/build for a while and was just pulled upstream by Linus. -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.