public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, tim.bird@am.sony.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kgdb,debug_core,kgdbts: End DEBUG_RODATA limitation using kprobe breakpoints
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 23:08:01 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F6C83C1.9050704@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F6B13BC.2070406@windriver.com>

(2012/03/22 20:57), Jason Wessel wrote:
> On 03/21/2012 09:53 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2012/03/22 2:55), Jason Wessel wrote:
>>> There has long been a limitation using software breakpoints with a
>>> kernel compiled with CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA.  The kprobe breakpoint code
>>> has its own text_poke() function which accommodates writing a
>>> breakpoint into a read-only page.  The debug_core can make use of the
>>> text_poke() capabilities by using the kprobes API, specifically
>>> arch_arm_kprobe() and arch_disarm_kprobe().  For now it is safe to use
>>> a single statically allocated kprobe structure to call the kprobes API
>>> because the debug_core breakpoint API is only used when the kernel is
>>> in the debug state.
>>
>> You might misunderstand it. arch_*_kprobe() are not open APIs.
>> Those are kprobes internal APIs (which means that those functions
>> should be used only by kprobes).
>>
>
>
> I was looking for an interface that solved the problem, without having
> to use text_poke directly which is arch specific.  Eventually I would
> like to use the kprobes high level API, but it cannot not be used
> without taking a mutex presently.  This is a separate problem to deal
> with at a later time, because the generic use of kprobes would be
> aimed at having robust single stepping.

I see.

>>> The debug_core will first attempt to use the traditional
>>> probe_kernel_write(), and next try using a kprobe breakpoint.  The
>>> kgdb test suite was updated to run all the software breakpoint tests
>>> when using a kernel with built with CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>
>>
>> Nak.
>>
>> No, please don't use kprobes internal function this way, because
>> you can't ensure that the arch_arm_kprobe() has no side-effect.
>>
>> Why don't you use text_poke()? I see that the text_poke()
>> is only for x86, but you already have arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c for
>> making your own wrapper function.
>
> I will use the arch specific provision to override the
> kgdb_arch_set_breakpoint() and use the text_poke() directly.

Thanks! that's what I meant. You can use __weak attribute.

> Eventually I would like to use the same software breakpoint
> reservation system as kprobes, and that would happen if kgdb ever
> starts using kprobes for single stepping.

Yeah, as far as I can see, current kprobes design assumes that
there is no other part uses sw breakpoint in kernel. But there
is kgdb now.
I think kprobes can share the sw breakpoint instrumentation and
single stepping with kgdb.

Thank you,



-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-23 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-21 17:55 [PATCH 0/2] Fix KGDB to work with CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA using kprobe API Jason Wessel
2012-03-21 17:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] kgdb,debug_core: pass the breakpoint struct instead of address and memory Jason Wessel
2012-03-21 17:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] kgdb,debug_core,kgdbts: End DEBUG_RODATA limitation using kprobe breakpoints Jason Wessel
2012-03-22  2:53   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-03-22 11:57     ` Jason Wessel
2012-03-23 14:08       ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2012-03-23 14:38         ` Jason Wessel
2012-03-26  9:46           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2012-03-26 16:39             ` Jason Wessel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F6C83C1.9050704@hitachi.com \
    --to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox