From: Karol Lewandowski <k.lewandowsk@samsung.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Cc: hskinnemoen@gmail.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
Rade Bozic <rade.bozic.ext@nsn.com>,
ben-linux@fluff.org, khali@linux-fr.org,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dirk.brandewie@gmail.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
m.szyprowski@samsung.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: Dynamically assign adapter id if it wasn't explictly specified
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:14:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F70336C.70205@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120322214714.GA24684@pengutronix.de>
On 22.03.2012 22:47, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> Dear Haavard, Rade, Wolfram and Russel
>>
>> Could you review following changes for gpio, octeon, pca-platform
>> and versatile i2c controller drivers (for which you are, or were,
>> maintainers)?
>>
>> Grant requested explicit Ack to get this merged.
>
> ? Since those are I2C patches, I was assuming that I pick them. After the merge
> window, that is. Did I miss something?
That's all fine by me. I just wanted confirmation from respective
maintainers that changes I'm doing are ok for them.
... and it looks changes to i2c-octeon are redundant in light of
the work maintainer has done. I'll drop this part and repost patch
again.
Thanks.
--
Karol Lewandowski | Samsung Poland R&D Center | Linux/Platform
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-26 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-16 12:19 [PATCH 0/2] i2c: Don't assume bus nr 0 if none was specified Karol Lewandowski
2012-03-16 12:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c-pxa: Drop leftover comment Karol Lewandowski
2012-03-16 12:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: Dynamically assign adapter id if it wasn't explictly specified Karol Lewandowski
2012-03-22 15:28 ` Karol Lewandowski
2012-03-22 16:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-22 17:03 ` Karol Lewandowski
2012-03-22 16:58 ` David Daney
2012-03-22 17:48 ` Karol Lewandowski
2012-03-22 18:07 ` David Daney
2012-03-22 21:47 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-03-26 9:14 ` Karol Lewandowski [this message]
2012-03-16 12:27 ` [PATCH 0/2] i2c: Don't assume bus nr 0 if none was specified Karol Lewandowski
2012-03-17 10:50 ` Grant Likely
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-03-27 9:10 [PATCH v2 " Karol Lewandowski
2012-03-27 9:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: Dynamically assign adapter id if it wasn't explictly specified Karol Lewandowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F70336C.70205@samsung.com \
--to=k.lewandowsk@samsung.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=dirk.brandewie@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=hskinnemoen@gmail.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=rade.bozic.ext@nsn.com \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox