From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755480Ab2CZUCP (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:02:15 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:56030 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752214Ab2CZUCN (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:02:13 -0400 Message-ID: <4F70CB12.3000104@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 13:01:22 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120209 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Borislav Petkov , Maciej Rutecki , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , florian@mickler.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: Tracking regressions for next release(s) References: <20120323101431.GA8832@liondog.tnic> <201203261847.17521.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> <20120326185849.GA19481@liondog.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20120326185849.GA19481@liondog.tnic> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/26/2012 11:58 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Well, if you still can report your results from it, I think maintainers > who are still interested in the quality of their code will be interested > in your testing reports. > > Thanks again for your work. > I agree; it is very easy to lose track of regressions and it is really useful to be reminded of them. That doesn't mean, however, that all bugzilla reports are useful or valid, but that doesn't mean the overall effort isn't useful. -hpa