From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/13] KVM: MMU: store more bits in rmap
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:24:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F742A55.2090001@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F742951.7080003@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In current code, only one bit (bit 0) is used in rmap, this patch export
more bits from rmap, during pte add/remove, it only touches bit 0 and other
bits are keeped
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 143 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index bb4d292..84b9775 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -796,6 +796,17 @@ static int mapping_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t large_gfn)
return level - 1;
}
+#define PTE_LIST_DESC (0x1ull)
+#define PTE_LIST_FLAG_MASK (0x3ull)
+
+static void
+pte_list_decode(const unsigned long *pte_list, unsigned long *map,
+ unsigned long *flags)
+{
+ *map = *pte_list & (~PTE_LIST_FLAG_MASK);
+ *flags = *pte_list & PTE_LIST_FLAG_MASK;
+}
+
/*
* Pte mapping structures:
*
@@ -812,50 +823,67 @@ static int pte_list_add(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte,
unsigned long *pte_list)
{
struct pte_list_desc *desc;
+ unsigned long map, flags;
int i, count = 0;
- if (!*pte_list) {
+ pte_list_decode(pte_list, &map, &flags);
+
+ if (!map) {
rmap_printk("pte_list_add: %p %llx 0->1\n", spte, *spte);
- *pte_list = (unsigned long)spte;
- } else if (!(*pte_list & 1)) {
+ WARN_ON(flags & PTE_LIST_DESC);
+ *pte_list = (unsigned long)spte | flags ;
+
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ if (!(flags & PTE_LIST_DESC)) {
rmap_printk("pte_list_add: %p %llx 1->many\n", spte, *spte);
desc = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(vcpu);
- desc->sptes[0] = (u64 *)*pte_list;
+ desc->sptes[0] = (u64 *)map;
desc->sptes[1] = spte;
- *pte_list = (unsigned long)desc | 1;
- ++count;
- } else {
- rmap_printk("pte_list_add: %p %llx many->many\n", spte, *spte);
- desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)(*pte_list & ~1ul);
- while (desc->sptes[PTE_LIST_EXT-1] && desc->more) {
- desc = desc->more;
- count += PTE_LIST_EXT;
- }
- if (desc->sptes[PTE_LIST_EXT-1]) {
- desc->more = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(vcpu);
- desc = desc->more;
- }
- for (i = 0; desc->sptes[i]; ++i)
- ++count;
- desc->sptes[i] = spte;
+ *pte_list = (unsigned long)desc | flags | PTE_LIST_DESC;
+
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ rmap_printk("pte_list_add: %p %llx many->many\n", spte, *spte);
+ desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)map;
+ while (desc->sptes[PTE_LIST_EXT - 1] && desc->more) {
+ desc = desc->more;
+ count += PTE_LIST_EXT;
+ }
+
+ if (desc->sptes[PTE_LIST_EXT - 1]) {
+ desc->more = mmu_alloc_pte_list_desc(vcpu);
+ desc = desc->more;
}
+
+ for (i = 0; desc->sptes[i]; ++i)
+ ++count;
+ desc->sptes[i] = spte;
+
return count;
}
static u64 *pte_list_next(unsigned long *pte_list, u64 *spte)
{
struct pte_list_desc *desc;
+ unsigned long map, flags;
u64 *prev_spte;
int i;
- if (!*pte_list)
+ pte_list_decode(pte_list, &map, &flags);
+
+ if (!map)
return NULL;
- else if (!(*pte_list & 1)) {
+
+ if (!(flags & PTE_LIST_DESC)) {
if (!spte)
- return (u64 *)*pte_list;
+ return (u64 *)map;
return NULL;
}
- desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)(*pte_list & ~1ul);
+
+ desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)map;
prev_spte = NULL;
while (desc) {
for (i = 0; i < PTE_LIST_EXT && desc->sptes[i]; ++i) {
@@ -870,7 +898,8 @@ static u64 *pte_list_next(unsigned long *pte_list, u64 *spte)
static void
pte_list_desc_remove_entry(unsigned long *pte_list, struct pte_list_desc *desc,
- int i, struct pte_list_desc *prev_desc)
+ int i, struct pte_list_desc *prev_desc,
+ unsigned long flags)
{
int j;
@@ -881,12 +910,13 @@ pte_list_desc_remove_entry(unsigned long *pte_list, struct pte_list_desc *desc,
if (j != 0)
return;
if (!prev_desc && !desc->more)
- *pte_list = (unsigned long)desc->sptes[0];
+ *pte_list = (unsigned long)desc->sptes[0] |
+ (flags & (~PTE_LIST_DESC)) ;
else
if (prev_desc)
prev_desc->more = desc->more;
else
- *pte_list = (unsigned long)desc->more | 1;
+ *pte_list = (unsigned long)desc->more | flags;
mmu_free_pte_list_desc(desc);
}
@@ -894,51 +924,60 @@ static void pte_list_remove(u64 *spte, unsigned long *pte_list)
{
struct pte_list_desc *desc;
struct pte_list_desc *prev_desc;
+ unsigned long map, flags;
int i;
- if (!*pte_list) {
+ pte_list_decode(pte_list, &map, &flags);
+
+ if (!map) {
printk(KERN_ERR "pte_list_remove: %p 0->BUG\n", spte);
BUG();
- } else if (!(*pte_list & 1)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (!(flags & PTE_LIST_DESC)) {
rmap_printk("pte_list_remove: %p 1->0\n", spte);
- if ((u64 *)*pte_list != spte) {
+ if ((u64 *)map != spte) {
printk(KERN_ERR "pte_list_remove: %p 1->BUG\n", spte);
BUG();
}
- *pte_list = 0;
- } else {
- rmap_printk("pte_list_remove: %p many->many\n", spte);
- desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)(*pte_list & ~1ul);
- prev_desc = NULL;
- while (desc) {
- for (i = 0; i < PTE_LIST_EXT && desc->sptes[i]; ++i)
- if (desc->sptes[i] == spte) {
- pte_list_desc_remove_entry(pte_list,
- desc, i,
- prev_desc);
- return;
- }
- prev_desc = desc;
- desc = desc->more;
- }
- pr_err("pte_list_remove: %p many->many\n", spte);
- BUG();
+ *pte_list = flags;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ rmap_printk("pte_list_remove: %p many->many\n", spte);
+ desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)map;
+ prev_desc = NULL;
+ while (desc) {
+ for (i = 0; i < PTE_LIST_EXT && desc->sptes[i]; ++i)
+ if (desc->sptes[i] == spte) {
+ pte_list_desc_remove_entry(pte_list,
+ desc, i, prev_desc, flags);
+ return;
+ }
+ prev_desc = desc;
+ desc = desc->more;
}
+ pr_err("pte_list_remove: %p many->many\n", spte);
+ BUG();
}
typedef void (*pte_list_walk_fn) (u64 *spte);
static void pte_list_walk(unsigned long *pte_list, pte_list_walk_fn fn)
{
struct pte_list_desc *desc;
+ unsigned long map, flags;
int i;
- if (!*pte_list)
+ pte_list_decode(pte_list, &map, &flags);
+
+ if (!map)
return;
- if (!(*pte_list & 1))
- return fn((u64 *)*pte_list);
+ if (!(flags & PTE_LIST_DESC))
+ return fn((u64 *)map);
- desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)(*pte_list & ~1ul);
+ desc = (struct pte_list_desc *)map;
while (desc) {
for (i = 0; i < PTE_LIST_EXT && desc->sptes[i]; ++i)
fn(desc->sptes[i]);
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-29 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-29 9:20 [PATCH 00/13] KVM: MMU: fast page fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-29 9:20 ` [PATCH 01/13] KVM: MMU: properly assert spte on rmap_next path Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-29 9:21 ` [PATCH 02/13] KVM: MMU: abstract spte write-protect Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-29 11:11 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-29 11:51 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-29 9:22 ` [PATCH 03/13] KVM: MMU: split FNAME(prefetch_invalid_gpte) Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-29 13:00 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-30 3:51 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-29 9:22 ` [PATCH 04/13] KVM: MMU: introduce FNAME(get_sp_gpa) Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-29 13:07 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-30 5:01 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-01 12:42 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 05/13] KVM: MMU: reset shadow_mmio_mask Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-29 13:10 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-29 15:28 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-29 16:24 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-29 9:23 ` [PATCH 06/13] KVM: VMX: export PFEC.P bit on ept Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-29 9:24 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-03-29 9:25 ` [PATCH 08/13] KVM: MMU: fask check whether page is writable Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-29 15:49 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-30 5:10 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-01 15:52 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-05 17:54 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-12 23:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-13 10:26 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-29 9:25 ` [PATCH 09/13] KVM: MMU: get expected spte out of mmu-lock Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-01 15:53 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-05 18:25 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-09 12:28 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-09 13:16 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-09 13:21 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-29 9:26 ` [PATCH 10/13] KVM: MMU: store vcpu id in spte to notify page write-protect path Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-29 9:27 ` [PATCH 11/13] KVM: MMU: fast path of handling guest page fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-31 12:24 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-01 16:23 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-03 13:04 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-05 19:39 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-29 9:27 ` [PATCH 12/13] KVM: MMU: trace fast " Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-29 9:28 ` [PATCH 13/13] KVM: MMU: fix kvm_mmu_pagetable_walk tracepoint Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-29 10:18 ` [PATCH 00/13] KVM: MMU: fast page fault Avi Kivity
2012-03-29 11:40 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-29 12:57 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-30 9:18 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-03-31 13:12 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-01 12:58 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-05 21:57 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-06 5:24 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-09 13:20 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-09 13:59 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-09 13:12 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-09 13:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-09 14:01 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-09 14:25 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-09 17:58 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-09 18:13 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-09 19:31 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-09 18:26 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-09 19:46 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-10 3:06 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-10 10:04 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-11 1:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-11 9:15 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-10 10:39 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-10 11:40 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-10 11:58 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-11 12:15 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-11 12:38 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-11 14:14 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-11 14:21 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-11 22:26 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-13 14:25 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-15 9:32 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-16 15:49 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-16 16:02 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-17 6:26 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-17 7:51 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-17 12:37 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-17 12:41 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-17 14:54 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-17 14:56 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-18 13:42 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-17 6:16 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-10 10:10 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F742A55.2090001@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).