From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752652Ab2CaUZN (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:25:13 -0400 Received: from oproxy4-pub.bluehost.com ([69.89.21.11]:51588 "HELO oproxy4-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752053Ab2CaUZJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:25:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4F77681E.5010608@xenotime.net> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:25:02 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110323 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linas Vepstas CC: "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org, linux-m32r-ja@ml.linux-m32r.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-am33-list@redhat.com, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, dhowells@redhat.com, jejb@parisc-linux.org, linux390@de.ibm.com, x86@kernel.org, cmetcalf@tilera.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] Simplify the Linux kernel by reducing its state space References: <20120331163321.GA15809@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120331201500.GA27640@linas.org> In-Reply-To: <20120331201500.GA27640@linas.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1807:box742.bluehost.com:xenotime:xenotime.net} {sentby:smtp auth 50.53.38.135 authed with rdunlap@xenotime.net} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/31/2012 01:15 PM, Linas Vepstas wrote: > > Hi, > > I didn't actually try to compile the patch below; it didn't look like > C code so I wasn't sure what compiler to run it through. I guess maybe > its python? However, I'm very sure that the patches are completely > correct, because I read them, and I also know Paul. And I've heard of > Thomas Gleixner. x86_64 defconfig has many build errors and warnings. :( back to my abacus. -- ~Randy