From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752389Ab2DAN5Q (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:57:16 -0400 Received: from e28smtp09.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.9]:60118 "EHLO e28smtp09.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751894Ab2DAN5O (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Apr 2012 09:57:14 -0400 Message-ID: <4F785E89.8080609@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 19:26:25 +0530 From: Raghavendra K T Organization: IBM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Avi Kivity CC: Alan Meadows , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , the arch/x86 maintainers , LKML , Marcelo Tosatti , KVM , Andi Kleen , Xen Devel , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Virtualization , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Stephan Diestelhorst , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Stefano Stabellini , Attilio Rao Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V6 0/11] Paravirtualized ticketlocks References: <20120321102041.473.61069.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> <4F707C5F.1000905@redhat.com> <4F716E31.3000803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F73568D.7000703@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F743247.5080407@redhat.com> <4F74A405.2040609@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F7585EE.7060203@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F7855A1.80107@redhat.com> <4F785CC9.7070204@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F785DCF.7020809@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4F785DCF.7020809@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-cbid: 12040113-2674-0000-0000-000003E7A522 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/01/2012 07:23 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 04/01/2012 04:48 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote: >>>> I have patch something like below in mind to try: > > I'm interested in how PLE does vs. your patches, both with PLE enabled > and disabled. > Sure. will update with the experimental results.