Re: [GIT PULL] KVM updates for the 3.4 merge window

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

On 04/02/2012 01:45 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 03:38:37PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 03/30/2012 03:01 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > > I just noticed that the branch you asked Linus to pull includes none
> > > of the patches that Alex sent you in the last batch, in the email with
> > > subject "[PULL 00/56] ppc patch queue 2012-03-15" sent on March 15,
> > > where he asked you to pull git://github.com/agraf/linux-2.6.git
> > > for-upstream.
> > >
> > > What happened?  Did they get lost in the re-signing, or is there some
> > > reason you thought they shouldn't go in?
> > 
> > That pull request was send three days before the merge window opened;
> > patches are supposed to cook for a while in -next before being merged,
> > especially large trees like that one.
>
> OK.  Then there are about six commits from that string that are small,
> simple fixes for bugs introduced in earlier patches, that only affect
> arch/powerpc.  They should go into Linus' tree as soon as possible.

Sure.

> How do you want to handle those?  Do you want them as patches or as a
> git tree, and if the latter, what do you prefer that I base them on?
> Or should I send them in via Ben?

Git tree against upstream please.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function