From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755406Ab2DCW0g (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:26:36 -0400 Received: from uhura.skim.hs-owl.de ([193.174.118.81]:35254 "EHLO uhura.skim.hs-owl.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753690Ab2DCW0e (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:26:34 -0400 Message-ID: <4F7B7911.5090307@googlemail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 00:26:25 +0200 From: Jan Seiffert Reply-To: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: , Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][PATCH V4 1/3] bpf jit: Make the filter.c::__load_pointer helper non-static for the jits References: <4F75CA89.4010709@googlemail.com> <4F75CC63.10405@googlemail.com> <20120403.180212.1644422418766062447.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20120403.180212.1644422418766062447.davem@davemloft.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Skim-SendBy: exchange.hs-owl.de on Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:26:30 +0200 X-Skim-SendBy: exchange.hs-owl.de on Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:26:31 +0200 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 193.174.118.178 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kaffeemonster@googlemail.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Miller schrieb: > From: Jan Seiffert > Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:08:19 +0200 > >> The function is renamed to make it a little more clear what it does. >> It is not added to any .h because it is not for general consumption, only for >> bpf internal use (and so by the jits). >> >> Signed-of-by: Jan Seiffert > > Applied but with comment formatting fixed up: > >> +/* >> + * No hurry in this branch >> + * >> + * Exported for the bpf jit load helper. >> + */ > > Like this: > >> +/* No hurry in this branch >> + * >> + * Exported for the bpf jit load helper. >> + */ > Thanks David! I was planning on a V5 for the little things i did wrong (wrong patch separator, etc.) but wanted to wait a little more for more feedback. Is that the preferred comment style in net/ ? Coding style says first line empty. Or just to match the rest of the file? Greetings Jan