From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756404Ab2DDMYn (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2012 08:24:43 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:42999 "EHLO mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756327Ab2DDMYm (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2012 08:24:42 -0400 Message-ID: <4F7C3D84.1080407@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 17:54:36 +0530 From: Subash Patel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kyungmin Park , Rob Clark , linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: Linux 3.4-rc1 References: <20120402084152.GA4612@phenom.ffwll.local> In-Reply-To: <20120402084152.GA4612@phenom.ffwll.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/02/2012 02:11 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:40:39PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Rob Clark wrote: >>> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Linus Torvalds >>> wrote: >>>> - drm dma-buf prime support. Dave Airlie sent me the pull request but >>>> didn't push very hard for it, it's in my "ok, I can still pull it for >>>> 3.4 if individual DRM driver people tell me that it will make their >>>> lives easier." So this is in limbo - I have nothing against it, but I >>>> won't pull unless I get a few people say "yes, please". >>> >>> yes, please :-) >>> >>> Note that the core drm dma-buf/prime support has already been reviewed >>> by a lot of folks, and tested with a few different drivers (exynos, >>> omapdrm, i915, nouveau, udl) with some driver support that could be >>> pushed for 3.5 cycle if the core support makes it in for 3.4 cycle. >> Yes, Please. >> >> It's used for exynos display and multimedia. > > Thirded. > > There are a lot of loose pieces to juggle until we have everything in > place for buffer sharing (and quite a few of this involve contentious > topics). But this core piece for integrating dma-buf with drm here has > been acked/reviewd by all the relevant people and merging it would imo > greatly help in wiring up all the other loose ends. > > Cheers, Daniel (yes, please) ++ I have been using the dma-buf with dma-mapping(Marek's patches) on origen(exynos4210), and basic things are good. I wish this gets into kernel along with the dma-mapping support asap. Regards, Subash