From: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource, prevent overflow in clocksource_cyc2ns
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 09:23:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F7DC6ED.7060508@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F7D7B4B.7050203@redhat.com>
On 04/05/2012 04:00 AM, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
>
> On 04/04/2012 09:08 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>> So what kernel version are you using?
> I was on an earlier version of Fedora (F16) ... but I'll jump forward and see if
> I can still hit it.
Ok, but if you have the specific kernel version, it would help, since
even if the issue is resolved upstream, we can see if a backport to
stable is appropriate.
> Keep in mind that 10000 threads is the *minimum* I was able to cause
> this with, which is only ~315 threads/cpu, which isn't a lot :/. At
> that number of threads the dump takes about 6 mins. Doubling it, IIRC,
> exceeded 10 mins.
At that point, if we're starving the system of interrupts for over 10
minutes, a number of other non-timekeeping issues can crop up. I've seen
scsci controllers fall over if their heart-beat checks don't come in, etc.
I suspect if printk dumps taking 10 minutes or more is going to be
considered "acceptable" behavior, we may need to see about adding some
breaks in the printk code, so that the system can take a few necessary
irqs.
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-05 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-04 15:11 [PATCH] clocksource, prevent overflow in clocksource_cyc2ns Prarit Bhargava
2012-04-04 18:00 ` John Stultz
2012-04-04 18:33 ` Prarit Bhargava
2012-04-05 1:08 ` John Stultz
2012-04-05 11:00 ` Prarit Bhargava
2012-04-05 16:23 ` John Stultz [this message]
2012-04-05 12:27 ` Prarit Bhargava
2012-04-05 16:45 ` John Stultz
2012-04-06 23:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-07 13:47 ` Prarit Bhargava
2012-04-18 23:20 ` John Stultz
2012-04-18 23:59 ` Prarit Bhargava
2012-04-19 0:18 ` John Stultz
2012-04-19 11:56 ` Prarit Bhargava
2012-04-19 12:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-19 12:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-19 13:06 ` Prarit Bhargava
2012-04-19 13:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-19 18:12 ` John Stultz
2012-04-25 12:29 ` Prarit Bhargava
2012-04-19 12:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-19 12:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F7DC6ED.7060508@us.ibm.com \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=sqazi@google.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox