From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755394Ab2DIHeY (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2012 03:34:24 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]:39081 "EHLO mail-wi0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755153Ab2DIHeT (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2012 03:34:19 -0400 Message-ID: <4F8290F8.90706@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 09:34:16 +0200 From: Juri Lelli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hillf Danton CC: Dario Faggioli , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] DLS: add dl_time_equal helper in deadline scheduler References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 04/07/2012 09:49 AM, Hillf Danton wrote: > Hi all > > A tiny helper, dl_time_equal, is added for easing readers. > > And dl_entity_preempt is redefined to be bool, and its comment is also changed. > > Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton > --- > > --- a/kernel/sched_dl.c Sat Apr 7 15:00:28 2012 > +++ b/kernel/sched_dl.c Sat Apr 7 15:20:10 2012 > @@ -16,16 +16,21 @@ > */ > static const struct sched_class dl_sched_class; > > -static inline int dl_time_before(u64 a, u64 b) > +static inline bool dl_time_equal(u64 a, u64 b) > +{ > + return a == b; > +} > + > +static inline bool dl_time_before(u64 a, u64 b) > { > return (s64)(a - b)< 0; > } > > /* > - * Tells if entity @a should preempt entity @b. > + * Return true if entity @a could preempt entity @b in term of deadline > */ > -static inline > -int dl_entity_preempt(struct sched_dl_entity *a, struct sched_dl_entity *b) > +static inline bool > +dl_entity_preempt(struct sched_dl_entity *a, struct sched_dl_entity *b) > { > return dl_time_before(a->deadline, b->deadline); > } > @@ -885,7 +890,7 @@ static void check_preempt_curr_dl(struct > * In the unlikely case current and p have the same deadline > * let us try to decide what's the best thing to do... > */ > - if ((s64)(p->dl.deadline - rq->curr->dl.deadline) == 0&& > + if (dl_time_equal(p->dl.deadline, rq->curr->dl.deadline)&& > !need_resched()) > check_preempt_equal_dl(rq, p); > #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */ > -- I'll change the comparison to be deadline_a == deadline_b, but I don't see the need for a special helper function. It is used only once, better to have the comparison really inline (a very special case). Thanks and Regards, - Juri