From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760177Ab2DKQJQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:09:16 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:61649 "EHLO mail-ee0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759964Ab2DKQJO (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:09:14 -0400 Message-ID: <4F85ACA5.1050902@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:09:09 +0200 From: Juri Lelli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Rostedt CC: Hillf Danton , peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, oleg@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, johan.eker@ericsson.com, p.faure@akatech.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, claudio@evidence.eu.com, michael@amarulasolutions.com, Fabio Checconi , Tommaso Cucinotta , Nicola Manica , Luca Abeni , Dhaval Giani , hgu1972@gmail.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Dario Faggioli , Insop Song , liming.wang@windriver.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/16] sched: SCHED_DEADLINE push and pull logic References: <1333696481-3433-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com> <1333696481-3433-7-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com> <4F7F285A.1010703@gmail.com> <4F81F2F1.8010105@gmail.com> <1334160026.23924.255.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <1334160026.23924.255.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 04/11/2012 06:00 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 22:20 +0200, Juri Lelli wrote: >>> >>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP >>>>>> + /* >>>>>> + * In the unlikely case current and p have the same deadline >>>>>> + * let us try to decide what's the best thing to do... >>>>>> + */ >>>>>> + if ((s64)(p->dl.deadline - rq->curr->dl.deadline) == 0&& >>>>>> + !need_resched()) >>>>> >>>>> please recheck !need_resched(), say rq->curr need reschedule? >>>> >>>> Sorry, I don't get this.. >>>> >>> Perhaps smp_processor_id() != rq->cpu >>> >> >> need_resched is actually checked... >> > > I guess what Hillf is trying to say is, > > s/!need_resched()/!test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr)/ > Yep, I finally got (and changed) it ;-). Thanks, - Juri