public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Alex Shi <lkml.alex@gmail.com>,
	mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, tglx@linutronix.de, "Chen,
	Tim C" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:timers/urgent] clockevents: tTack broadcast device mode change in tick_broadcast_switch_to_oneshot()
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 13:10:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8663B3.9060900@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334205354.2583.1.camel@sbsiddha-mobl2>

On 04/12/2012 12:35 PM, Suresh Siddha wrote:

> On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 09:27 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>> This patch recovered the loopback netperf testing on NHM machine, but
>> on SNB machine, It isn't need a broadcost timer at all.
>>
>> Do you think it is better to remove oneshot broadcast on WSM/SNB machine?
> 
> on WSM/SNB, we already don't use broadcast timer and always use
> apictimer instead.


Yes, you are right. I omitted this.

Tick Device: mode:     1
Broadcast device
Clock Event Device: hpet
...
tick_broadcast_mask: 00000000
tick_broadcast_oneshot_mask: 00000000


> 
> thanks,
> suresh
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-12  5:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-09  6:03 [PATCH] clockevents: Leave broadcast device shtudown only if the current device is always running Santosh Shilimkar
2012-04-09 22:41 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-04-10  6:56   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-04-10  9:49   ` [tip:timers/urgent] clockevents: tTack broadcast device mode change in tick_broadcast_switch_to_oneshot() tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-04-12  1:27     ` Alex Shi
2012-04-12  4:35       ` Suresh Siddha
2012-04-12  5:10         ` Alex Shi [this message]
     [not found]   ` <CA++bM2th5XW1gxrHbcHwDK=qBBaNc3ut0ydbNNStfNa-Xa-9tA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-11  6:34     ` [PATCH] clockevents: Leave broadcast device shtudown only if the current device is always running Feng Tang
2012-04-11 10:10       ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-11 16:04         ` Feng Tang
2012-04-11 21:01           ` Suresh Siddha
2012-04-15 12:57   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-04-16 22:03     ` Suresh Siddha
2012-04-17  8:14       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-04-17 19:11         ` Suresh Siddha
2012-04-18  5:41           ` Shilimkar, Santosh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F8663B3.9060900@intel.com \
    --to=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml.alex@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox