From: Stuart Hodgson <smhodgson@solarflare.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>,
<mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>, <decot@google.com>,
<amit.salecha@qlogic.com>, <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>,
<davem@davemloft.net>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] net: ethtool: Add capability to retrieve plug-in module EEPROM
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:18:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F869DF0.1000709@solarflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334187728.2552.7.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
On 12/04/12 00:42, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 19:16 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 17:50 +0100, Stuart Hodgson wrote:
>>> On 02/04/12 18:52, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>> --- a/net/core/ethtool.c
>>>>> +++ b/net/core/ethtool.c
>> [...]
>>>>> + if (eeprom.offset + eeprom.len> modinfo.eeprom_len)
>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + data = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_USER);
>>>>> + if (!data)
>>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>>
>>>> What if some device has a larger EEPROM? Surely this length should be
>>>> eeprom.len.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Do you mean what if the eeprom length in te device is larger than
>>> PAGE_SIZE?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>> If so then it should really use modinfo.eeprom_len since
>>> this the size of the data. eeprom.len could be arbitary.
>>
>> No, eeprom.len is the size of the data and we've already validated it at
>> this point.
>
> Maybe we should start by refactoring ethtool_get_eeprom() so we can
> reuse most of its code in ethtool_get_module_eeprom(), rather than
> having to worry about what the maximum size of a module EEPROM might be
> and whether we need a loop:
>
> Subject: ethtool: Split ethtool_get_eeprom() to allow for additional EEPROM accessors
>
> We want to support reading module (SFP+, XFP, ...) EEPROMs as well as
> NIC EEPROMs. They will need a different command number and driver
> operation, but the structure and arguments will be the same and so we
> can share most of the code here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings<bhutchings@solarflare.com>
> ---
> net/core/ethtool.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/ethtool.c b/net/core/ethtool.c
> index beacdd9..ca7698f 100644
> --- a/net/core/ethtool.c
> +++ b/net/core/ethtool.c
> @@ -751,18 +751,17 @@ static int ethtool_get_link(struct net_device *dev, char __user *useraddr)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int ethtool_get_eeprom(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
> +static int ethtool_get_any_eeprom(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr,
> + int (*getter)(struct net_device *,
> + struct ethtool_eeprom *, u8 *),
> + u32 total_len)
> {
> struct ethtool_eeprom eeprom;
> - const struct ethtool_ops *ops = dev->ethtool_ops;
> void __user *userbuf = useraddr + sizeof(eeprom);
> u32 bytes_remaining;
> u8 *data;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (!ops->get_eeprom || !ops->get_eeprom_len)
> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -
> if (copy_from_user(&eeprom, useraddr, sizeof(eeprom)))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> @@ -771,7 +770,7 @@ static int ethtool_get_eeprom(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /* Check for exceeding total eeprom len */
> - if (eeprom.offset + eeprom.len> ops->get_eeprom_len(dev))
> + if (eeprom.offset + eeprom.len> total_len)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> data = kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_USER);
Should this not be eeprom.len?
> @@ -782,7 +781,7 @@ static int ethtool_get_eeprom(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
> while (bytes_remaining> 0) {
> eeprom.len = min(bytes_remaining, (u32)PAGE_SIZE);
>
> - ret = ops->get_eeprom(dev,&eeprom, data);
> + ret = getter(dev,&eeprom, data);
> if (ret)
> break;
> if (copy_to_user(userbuf, data, eeprom.len)) {
> @@ -803,6 +802,17 @@ static int ethtool_get_eeprom(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int ethtool_get_eeprom(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
> +{
> + const struct ethtool_ops *ops = dev->ethtool_ops;
> +
> + if (!ops->get_eeprom || !ops->get_eeprom_len)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + return ethtool_get_any_eeprom(dev, useraddr, ops->get_eeprom,
> + ops->get_eeprom_len(dev));
> +}
> +
> static int ethtool_set_eeprom(struct net_device *dev, void __user *useraddr)
> {
> struct ethtool_eeprom eeprom;
This would reduce the code size nicely between the two eeprom fetches.
Stu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-12 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-27 17:51 [RFC PATCH 1/2] net: ethtool: Add capability to retrieve plug-in module EEPROM Stuart Hodgson
2012-04-02 17:52 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-04-02 18:14 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-04-11 16:50 ` Stuart Hodgson
2012-04-11 18:16 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-04-11 23:42 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-04-12 9:18 ` Stuart Hodgson [this message]
2012-04-12 18:41 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F869DF0.1000709@solarflare.com \
--to=smhodgson@solarflare.com \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=amit.salecha@qlogic.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=decot@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox