From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Merge task counter into memcg
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:43:02 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F86BFC6.2050400@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120412113217.GB11455@somewhere.redhat.com>
On 04/12/2012 08:32 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> But I think increasing number of subsystem is not very good....
> If the result is a better granularity on the overhead, I believe this
> can be a good thing.
But again, since there is quite number of people trying to merge those
stuff together, you are just swimming against the tide.
If this gets really integrated, out of a sudden the overhead will
appear. So better care about it now.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-12 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-11 18:57 [RFD] Merge task counter into memcg Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-11 19:21 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-12 11:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-12 0:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 11:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-12 11:43 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2012-04-12 12:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-04-12 13:12 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-12 15:30 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-04-12 16:38 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-12 17:04 ` Cgroup in a single hierarchy (Was: Re: [RFD] Merge task counter into memcg) Glauber Costa
2012-04-17 15:13 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-17 15:27 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-12 17:13 ` [RFD] Merge task counter into memcg Glauber Costa
2012-04-12 17:23 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-04-12 17:41 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-12 17:53 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-13 1:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-13 1:50 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-13 2:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-17 15:41 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-17 16:52 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-18 6:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-18 7:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-18 8:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-18 9:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-18 10:39 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-04-18 11:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-04-12 16:54 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-12 1:07 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-04-12 2:15 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-12 3:26 ` Li Zefan
2012-04-12 14:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-12 16:34 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-12 16:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-17 15:17 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-18 6:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-18 8:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-18 12:00 ` Glauber Costa
2012-04-12 4:00 ` Alexander Nikiforov
[not found] ` <4F86527C.2080507@samsung.com>
2012-04-17 1:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-04-17 6:45 ` Alexander Nikiforov
2012-04-17 15:23 ` Tejun Heo
2012-04-19 3:34 ` Alexander Nikiforov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F86BFC6.2050400@parallels.com \
--to=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dwalsh@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox