From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Ian Abbott <ian.abbott@mev.co.uk>,
"devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
Gerard Snitselaar <dev@snitselaar.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"fmhess@users.sourceforge.net" <fmhess@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: comedi: resolve section mismatch in s626
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:03:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F86D294.3050108@mev.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120410182438.GB2052@kroah.com>
On 2012/04/10 07:24 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:48:54AM +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
>> On 2012-03-19 23:26, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 03:46:49PM -0700, Gerard Snitselaar wrote:
>>>> I looked at this a bit more. It looks like they lose visibility to the
>>>> pci_dev structure.
>>>>
>>>> *_probe()
>>>> comedi_pci_auto_config() pci_dev
>>>> comedi_auto_config() pci_dev->dev
>>>> comedi_device_attach() ??
>>>> driv->attach() ??<= iterate through pci devices.
>>>>
>>>> Most of the examples I have looked at so far use for_each_pci_dev() to
>>>> find the device, and s626 shortcuts it a bit by directly making calls
>>>> to pci_get_subsys() with specific ids. They all verify they have the
>>>> right device by checking the bus and slot that are grabbed from the
>>>> pci_dev in comedi_pci_auto_config() and passed down.
>>>
>>> Ugh, surely there's a way to keep the pci dev through the
>>> comedi_device_attach() call, right?
>>
>> comedi_device_attach() is also called for the COMEDI_DEVCONFIG ioctl
>> for "manually" configuring a comedi device, and that has no idea
>> about struct pci_dev, etc.
>>
>> I recently posted a series of patches that allows lower-level comedi
>> drivers to supply separate hooks for auto-configuring PCI devices or
>> USB devices without abusing the old "manual configuration" code
>> paths, see <http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-March/025331.html>.
>>
>> The old loop that searches the PCI bus is still needed for the
>> "manual configuration" code path.
>
> So, now that I've applied your patches, this patch isn't needed anymore,
> right? Or should it be reworked to use the new interfaces?
I think it's still needed as that the comedi_driver->attach() hook is
still needed to support manual configuration by the COMEDI_DEVCONFIG
ioctl, and the existing code really shouldn't be looking in
s626_pci_table[] as it's tagged __devinitconst.
I never saw any mismatched section warnings when I compiled a linux-next
kernel on my system with a full set of comedi drivers, even with
CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH configured. I'm not sure why not, unless
it has something to do with me building the kernel with a separate build
directory.
The new comedi_driver->attach_pci() hook should be implemented for this
driver as well, and it's on my "todo" list (in my head!).
--
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbotti@mev.co.uk> )=-
-=( Tel: +44 (0)161 477 1898 FAX: +44 (0)161 718 3587 )=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-12 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-19 2:25 [PATCH] staging: comedi: resolve section mismatch in s626 Gerard Snitselaar
2012-03-19 3:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Gerard Snitselaar
2012-03-19 16:31 ` Greg KH
2012-03-19 16:43 ` Gerard Snitselaar
2012-03-19 22:46 ` Gerard Snitselaar
2012-03-19 23:26 ` Greg KH
2012-04-02 10:48 ` Ian Abbott
2012-04-10 18:24 ` Greg KH
2012-04-10 19:24 ` Gerard Snitselaar
2012-04-12 13:03 ` Ian Abbott [this message]
2012-04-18 23:28 ` Greg KH
2012-04-20 1:34 ` Gerard Snitselaar
2012-04-20 15:33 ` Greg KH
2012-04-24 1:30 ` [PATCH v2 resend] " Gerard Snitselaar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F86D294.3050108@mev.co.uk \
--to=abbotti@mev.co.uk \
--cc=dev@snitselaar.org \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=fmhess@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ian.abbott@mev.co.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox