Re: [PATCH 6/6] proc: use IS_ERR_OR_NULL()

Hugh Dickins
2012-04-12T19:27:17Z

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> (4/12/12 9:23 AM), Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Cong Wang<xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > - if (mm&& !IS_ERR(mm)) {
> > > + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mm)) {
> >
> > I personally find original code way more readable.
>
> personally, me too. but new one is also acceptable to me.

That now makes 4 votes that it's not an improvement, with no dissent
(unless akpm's + proc-use-is_err_or_null.patch added to -mm tree
should be counted as dissent): let's drop this patch.

Hugh