From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/16] KVM: MMU: introduce mmu_spte_establish
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:10:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F87FB8B.5010205@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F87FA69.5060106@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
It is used to establish the spte if it is not present to cleanup the
code, it also marks spte present before linking it to the sp's
parent_list, then we can integrate the code between rmap walking and
parent_lisk walking in the later patch
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 16 ++++------
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 151fcddc..aee13c6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1368,9 +1368,6 @@ static unsigned kvm_page_table_hashfn(gfn_t gfn)
static void mmu_page_add_parent_pte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *parent_pte)
{
- if (!parent_pte)
- return;
-
pte_list_add(vcpu, parent_pte, &sp->parent_ptes);
}
@@ -1401,7 +1398,6 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
list_add(&sp->link, &vcpu->kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages);
bitmap_zero(sp->slot_bitmap, KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM);
sp->parent_ptes = 0;
- mmu_page_add_parent_pte(vcpu, sp, parent_pte);
kvm_mod_used_mmu_pages(vcpu->kvm, +1);
return sp;
}
@@ -1765,12 +1761,8 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (sp->unsync && kvm_sync_page_transient(vcpu, sp))
break;
- mmu_page_add_parent_pte(vcpu, sp, parent_pte);
- if (sp->unsync_children) {
+ if (sp->unsync_children)
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_MMU_SYNC, vcpu);
- kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp);
- } else if (sp->unsync)
- kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp);
__clear_sp_write_flooding_count(sp);
trace_kvm_mmu_get_page(sp, false);
@@ -1797,6 +1789,35 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return sp;
}
+static void link_shadow_page(u64 *sptep, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+{
+ u64 spte;
+
+ spte = __pa(sp->spt) | PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_WRITABLE_MASK |
+ shadow_user_mask | shadow_x_mask | shadow_accessed_mask;
+
+ mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
+}
+
+static struct kvm_mmu_page *
+mmu_spte_establish(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *spte, gfn_t gfn, gva_t gaddr,
+ unsigned level, int direct, unsigned access)
+{
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
+
+ WARN_ON(is_shadow_present_pte(*spte));
+
+ sp = kvm_mmu_get_page(vcpu, gfn, gaddr, level, direct, access, spte);
+
+ link_shadow_page(spte, sp);
+ mmu_page_add_parent_pte(vcpu, sp, spte);
+
+ if (sp->unsync_children || sp->unsync)
+ kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync(sp);
+
+ return sp;
+}
+
static void shadow_walk_init(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator,
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr)
{
@@ -1846,16 +1867,6 @@ static void shadow_walk_next(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator)
return __shadow_walk_next(iterator, *iterator->sptep);
}
-static void link_shadow_page(u64 *sptep, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
-{
- u64 spte;
-
- spte = __pa(sp->spt) | PT_PRESENT_MASK | PT_WRITABLE_MASK |
- shadow_user_mask | shadow_x_mask | shadow_accessed_mask;
-
- mmu_spte_set(sptep, spte);
-}
-
static void drop_large_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep)
{
if (is_large_pte(*sptep)) {
@@ -1921,11 +1932,6 @@ static void kvm_mmu_page_unlink_children(struct kvm *kvm,
mmu_page_zap_pte(kvm, sp, sp->spt + i);
}
-static void kvm_mmu_put_page(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *parent_pte)
-{
- mmu_page_remove_parent_pte(sp, parent_pte);
-}
-
static void kvm_mmu_unlink_parents(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
u64 *sptep;
@@ -2511,7 +2517,6 @@ static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t v, int write,
bool prefault)
{
struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator iterator;
- struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
int emulate = 0;
gfn_t pseudo_gfn;
@@ -2532,16 +2537,9 @@ static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t v, int write,
base_addr &= PT64_LVL_ADDR_MASK(iterator.level);
pseudo_gfn = base_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- sp = kvm_mmu_get_page(vcpu, pseudo_gfn, iterator.addr,
- iterator.level - 1,
- 1, ACC_ALL, iterator.sptep);
- if (!sp) {
- pgprintk("nonpaging_map: ENOMEM\n");
- kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
-
- link_shadow_page(iterator.sptep, sp);
+ mmu_spte_establish(vcpu, iterator.sptep, pseudo_gfn,
+ iterator.addr, iterator.level - 1,
+ 1, ACC_ALL);
}
}
return emulate;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
index df5a703..e3cf43b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -503,8 +503,9 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
sp = NULL;
if (!is_shadow_present_pte(*it.sptep)) {
table_gfn = gw->table_gfn[it.level - 2];
- sp = kvm_mmu_get_page(vcpu, table_gfn, addr, it.level-1,
- false, access, it.sptep);
+ sp = mmu_spte_establish(vcpu, it.sptep, table_gfn,
+ addr, it.level-1, false,
+ access);
}
/*
@@ -513,9 +514,6 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
*/
if (FNAME(gpte_changed)(vcpu, gw, it.level - 1))
goto out_gpte_changed;
-
- if (sp)
- link_shadow_page(it.sptep, sp);
}
for (;
@@ -533,9 +531,8 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
direct_gfn = gw->gfn & ~(KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(it.level) - 1);
- sp = kvm_mmu_get_page(vcpu, direct_gfn, addr, it.level-1,
- true, direct_access, it.sptep);
- link_shadow_page(it.sptep, sp);
+ mmu_spte_establish(vcpu, it.sptep, direct_gfn, addr, it.level-1,
+ true, direct_access);
}
clear_sp_write_flooding_count(it.sptep);
@@ -548,7 +545,8 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
out_gpte_changed:
if (sp)
- kvm_mmu_put_page(sp, it.sptep);
+ drop_parent_pte(sp, it.sptep);
+
kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
return NULL;
}
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-13 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-13 10:05 [PATCH v2 00/16] KVM: MMU: fast page fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:09 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] KVM: MMU: cleanup __direct_map Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:10 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2012-04-13 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] KVM: MMU: properly assert spte on rmap walking path Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-14 2:15 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-16 3:26 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] KVM: MMU: return bool in __rmap_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-14 2:00 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-15 11:25 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-16 14:14 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-16 14:28 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-16 15:54 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-13 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] KVM: MMU: abstract spte write-protect Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-14 2:26 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-16 3:27 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:12 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] KVM: VMX: export PFEC.P bit on ept Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:12 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] KVM: MMU: introduce for_each_pte_list_spte Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-14 2:44 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-16 3:36 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-17 14:47 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-18 4:01 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 1:01 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-21 4:36 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-18 10:03 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-21 1:03 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-13 10:13 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] KVM: MMU: store more bits in rmap Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:13 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] KVM: MMU: fast mmu_need_write_protect path for hard mmu Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:14 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] KVM: MMU: fask check whether page is writable Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-14 3:01 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-16 3:38 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-15 15:16 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-16 3:25 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-16 10:02 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-16 10:20 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-16 11:47 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-17 3:55 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-17 7:41 ` Avi Kivity
2012-04-17 12:10 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:14 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] KVM: MMU: introduce SPTE_ALLOW_WRITE bit Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] KVM: MMU: introduce SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT bit Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:15 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] KVM: MMU: break sptes write-protect if gfn is writable Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:16 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] KVM: MMU: fast path of handling guest page fault Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-18 1:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-18 3:53 ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-18 23:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-04-13 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] KVM: MMU: trace fast " Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-13 10:17 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] KVM: MMU: fix kvm_mmu_pagetable_walk tracepoint Xiao Guangrong
2012-04-14 3:37 ` [PATCH v2 00/16] KVM: MMU: fast page fault Takuya Yoshikawa
2012-04-16 3:50 ` Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F87FB8B.5010205@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox