From: Mark Lord <kernel@teksavvy.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [REGRESSION] rtc/interface.c: kills suspend-to-ram
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:36:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8BA1C1.4030804@teksavvy.com> (raw)
Something recent has killed suspend-to-ram on a number of machines here.
The symptom is that they suspend, but immediately wake up and panic,
with just a black screen so no visible messages to go by.
The patch below works around the issue -- making things work as they used to work.
--- linux/drivers/rtc/interface.c.orig 2012-04-16 00:08:47.615389718 -0400
+++ linux/drivers/rtc/interface.c 2012-04-16 00:09:14.105387382 -0400
@@ -773,7 +773,7 @@
if (!rtc->ops || !rtc->ops->alarm_irq_enable)
return;
- rtc->ops->alarm_irq_enable(rtc->dev.parent, false);
+ //rtc->ops->alarm_irq_enable(rtc->dev.parent, false); // Kills suspend on ZBOX HD-ID41U
}
/**
Last known working kernel was 3.2.11.
The line above got added somewhere between it and 3.2.15,
and is also present (no surprise) in newer kernels.
The highest kernel I've tested for this is 3.3.2,
which also fails until I nuke the line shown above.
This is straight x86_64 (Atom) hardware, using rtc-cmos.
I can re-test if anyone has a fix for this.
Meanwhile, whatever patch put this into -stable probably
ought to be reverted upstream and in -stable as well.
Cheers
next reply other threads:[~2012-04-16 4:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-16 4:36 Mark Lord [this message]
2012-04-16 13:55 ` [REGRESSION] rtc/interface.c: kills suspend-to-ram Mark Lord
2012-04-16 14:23 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-04-16 15:42 ` Mark Lord
2012-04-16 15:49 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2012-04-16 15:57 ` Mark Lord
2012-04-16 19:45 ` John Stultz
2012-04-16 21:43 ` John Stultz
2012-04-17 2:30 ` Mark Lord
2012-04-17 5:13 ` John Stultz
2012-04-17 12:51 ` Mark Lord
2012-04-17 20:11 ` Mark Lord
2012-04-17 20:12 ` Mark Lord
2012-04-17 23:02 ` John Stultz
2012-04-18 1:29 ` Mark Lord
2012-04-18 18:29 ` John Stultz
2012-04-27 14:33 ` Mark Lord
2012-04-27 19:22 ` John Stultz
2012-04-16 19:44 ` John Stultz
2012-04-17 2:27 ` Mark Lord
2012-04-16 14:26 ` [rtc-linux] " Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F8BA1C1.4030804@teksavvy.com \
--to=kernel@teksavvy.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox