From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>, Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: always set the sched clock as unstable
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:59:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8C33E0.2080007@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F8C1F6D020000780007E11A@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 16/04/12 12:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 13.04.12 at 20:20, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> wrote:
>> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>>
>> The sched clock was considered stable based on the capabilities of the
>> underlying hardware. This does not make sense for Xen PV guests as:
>> a) the hardware TSC is not used directly as the clock source; and b)
>> guests may migrate to hosts with different hardware capabilities.
>>
>> It is not clear to me whether the Xen clock source is supposed to be
>> stable and whether it should be stable across migration. For a clock
>> source to be stable it must be: a) monotonic; c) synchronized across
>> CPUs; and c) constant rate.
Tim, Thomas, can you comment on the above paragraph? Is it correct?
>> There have also been reports of systems with apparently unstable
>> clocks where clearing sched_clock_stable has fixed problems with
>> migrated VMs hanging.
>>
>> So, always set the sched clock as unstable when using the Xen clock
>> source.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/xen/time.c | 1 +
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/time.c b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>> index 0296a95..8469b5a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/time.c
>> @@ -473,6 +473,7 @@ static void __init xen_time_init(void)
>> do_settimeofday(&tp);
>>
>> setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC);
>> + sched_clock_stable = 0;
>
> This, unfortunately, is not sufficient afaict: If a CPU gets brought up
> post-boot, the variable may need to be cleared again. Instead you
> ought to call mark_tsc_unstable().
Yeah, mark_tsc_unstable() is the right thing to do.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-16 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-13 18:20 [PATCH] xen: always set the sched clock as unstable David Vrabel
2012-04-13 18:33 ` Sheng Yang
[not found] ` <CA+2rt41ctpU-vhR7=u_r45=o8djpq0-5YE5jcj_4FR2bWYu5pQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-13 18:39 ` David Vrabel
2012-04-16 11:32 ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-16 14:59 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2012-04-16 15:16 ` Tim Deegan
2012-04-16 15:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-04-16 16:20 ` [Xen-devel] " Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 16:05 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 16:14 ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-16 17:22 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17 7:27 ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-17 15:36 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 16:26 ` David Vrabel
2012-04-16 17:30 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17 7:47 ` Jan Beulich
2012-04-17 15:42 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 17:08 ` Tim Deegan
2012-04-16 17:52 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-16 18:17 ` Tim Deegan
2012-04-16 23:01 ` Sheng Yang
2012-04-17 0:29 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-04-17 8:19 ` Tim Deegan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F8C33E0.2080007@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sheng@yasker.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox