From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755811Ab2DSRM4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:12:56 -0400 Received: from antcom.de ([188.40.178.216]:41583 "EHLO chuck.antcom.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754454Ab2DSRMz (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:12:55 -0400 Message-ID: <4F904795.4050505@antcom.de> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 19:12:53 +0200 From: Roland Stigge Organization: ANTCOM IT Research & Development User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20120216 Icedove/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: arm@kernel.org CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Defconfig update for LPC32xx X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 OpenPGP: url=subkeys.pgp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I'm planning to update arch/arm/configs/lpc32xx_defconfig, adjusting to device tree and new driver options. Now I wonder if I should (1) just add drivers which are used on the reference machine (PHYTEC LPC3250 board) or (2) additionally add all drivers that I have seen together with LPC32xx on other boards also, which would demonstrate that the same binary kernel runs on all LPC32xx machines, but increasing kernel size a bit. I would prefer option (2) but first want to ask for advice. Thanks in advance, Roland